Reka Edge vs Sakana Namazu
Reka Edge costs 40.0x less per output token than Sakana Namazu ($0.10 vs $4.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $0.10
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $4.00
Reka Edge or Sakana Namazu: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Reka Edge for output tokens 40.0x cheaper ($0.10 vs $4.00 per million).
No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Sakana Namazu
Sakana Namazu takes 262K tokens against 16K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Reka Edge
Reka Edge $0.0001, Sakana Namazu $0.0029 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Reka Edge not benchmarked, Sakana Namazu not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- Reka Edge $0.10 against Sakana Namazu $4.00 per million output tokens, 40.0x apart.
- Context window
- Reka Edge takes 16K tokens, Sakana Namazu 262K.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Reka Edge costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Reka Edge costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Reka Edge costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Reka Edge | Sakana Namazu |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Reka | Sakana |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | March 20, 2026 | August 11, 2026 |
| Context window | 16K | 262K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.10 | $0.95 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.10 | $4.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Reka Edge better than Sakana Namazu for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Reka Edge for output tokens 40.0x cheaper ($0.10 vs $4.00 per million).
Which is cheaper, Reka Edge or Sakana Namazu?
Reka Edge costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $0.10 per million output tokens; Sakana Namazu costs $0.95 and $4.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Reka Edge or Sakana Namazu?
Sakana Namazu, with 262K tokens against 16K.
Has any benchmark tested both Reka Edge and Sakana Namazu?
No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 23, 2026.