Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Beam 1.0 501B A23B vs Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2

Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 costs 1.4x less per output token than Beam 1.0 501B A23B ($0.85 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

R Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflection
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.20
S Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2Sao10K
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.85
vs $1.20 vs $0.85 per 1M output tokens. Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 is 1.4x cheaper.

Beam 1.0 501B A23B or Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Beam 1.0 501B A23B for a larger context window (1.05M against 131K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Beam 1.0 501B A23B has results on LMArena WebDev, LMArena Text: coding and LMArena Text: software and IT; Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Beam 1.0 501B A23B not benchmarked, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Beam 1.0 501B A23B $1.20 against Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 $0.85 per million output tokens, 1.4x apart.
Context window
Beam 1.0 501B A23B takes 1.05M tokens, Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
BenchmarkBeam 1.0 501B A23BLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2Leader
LMArena WebDev1437Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: coding1473Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1461Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena WebDev: React1443Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1436Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
BenchmarkBeam 1.0 501B A23BLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2Leader
LMArena Text: hard prompts1442Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: expert1447Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1451Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
BenchmarkBeam 1.0 501B A23BLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2Leader
LMArena Text: math1459Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1475Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
BenchmarkBeam 1.0 501B A23BLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2Leader
LMArena Text: science1430Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1376Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1433Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1430Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
BenchmarkBeam 1.0 501B A23BLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2Leader
Design Arena: websites1245Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Design Arena: game dev1220Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index12 boards measured
General benchmarks for Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
BenchmarkBeam 1.0 501B A23BLlama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2Leader
LMArena Text1425Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1430Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1390Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: English1436Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: non-English1413Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1424Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: French1461Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: Russian1412Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1414Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1429Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1400Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1399Not measuredOnly Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.0010Fits in one request
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2$0.0013Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.024Fits in one request
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2$0.045Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.092Fits in one request
Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2$0.178Exceeds the context window

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
SpecificationReflection Beam 1.0 501B A23BSao10K Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2
MakerReflectionSao10K
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 16, 2026August 28, 2024
Context window1.05M131K
Input $/Mtok$0.40$0.85
Output $/Mtok$1.20$0.85
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Beam 1.0 501B A23B better than Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Beam 1.0 501B A23B for a larger context window (1.05M against 131K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Beam 1.0 501B A23B or Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2?

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 costs $0.85 and $0.85. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Beam 1.0 501B A23B or Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2?

Beam 1.0 501B A23B, with 1.05M tokens against 131K.

Has any benchmark tested both Beam 1.0 501B A23B and Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Beam 1.0 501B A23B has results on LMArena WebDev, LMArena Text: coding and LMArena Text: software and IT; Llama 3.1 Euryale 70B v2.2 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next