Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs Hy-MT2-30B-A3B

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs 3.4x less per output token than Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking ($0.295 vs $1.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Replace Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking Replace Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.00
Hy-MT2-30B-A3BTencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.295
vs $1.00 vs $0.295 per 1M output tokens. Hy-MT2-30B-A3B is 3.4x cheaper.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking or Hy-MT2-30B-A3B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking for a larger context window (262K against 8K tokens).

Model AQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingQwenNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BHy-MT2-30B-A3BTencentNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking has results on AA Intelligence Index; Hy-MT2-30B-A3B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking not benchmarked, Hy-MT2-30B-A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking $1.00 against Hy-MT2-30B-A3B $0.295 per million output tokens, 3.4x apart.
Context window
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking takes 262K tokens, Hy-MT2-30B-A3B 8K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking and Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
BenchmarkQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingHy-MT2-30B-A3BLeader
AA Intelligence Index9.5Not measuredOnly Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking$0.0008Fits in one request
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B$0.0002Fits in one request

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking$0.018Fits in one request
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B$0.0046Exceeds the context window

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking$0.068Fits in one request
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B$0.018Exceeds the context window

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking and Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
SpecificationQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingTencent Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
MakerQwenTencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 6, 2025August 20, 2026
Context window262K8K
Input $/Mtok$0.29$0.074
Output $/Mtok$1.00$0.295
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking better than Hy-MT2-30B-A3B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking for a larger context window (262K against 8K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking or Hy-MT2-30B-A3B?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs $0.29 per million input tokens and $1.00 per million output tokens; Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs $0.074 and $0.295. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking or Hy-MT2-30B-A3B?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking, with 262K tokens against 8K.

Has any benchmark tested both Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking and Hy-MT2-30B-A3B?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking has results on AA Intelligence Index; Hy-MT2-30B-A3B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next