Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking vs Fugu Ultra v2

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs 30.0x less per output token than Fugu Ultra v2 ($1.00 vs $30.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Replace Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking Replace Fugu Ultra v2
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.00
Fugu Ultra v2Sakana
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$30.00
vs $1.00 vs $30.00 per 1M output tokens. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking is 30.0x cheaper.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking or Fugu Ultra v2: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking for output tokens 30.0x cheaper ($1.00 vs $30.00 per million).

Model AQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingQwenNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BFugu Ultra v2SakanaNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking has results on AA Intelligence Index; Fugu Ultra v2 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking not benchmarked, Fugu Ultra v2 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking $1.00 against Fugu Ultra v2 $30.00 per million output tokens, 30.0x apart.
Context window
Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking takes 262K tokens, Fugu Ultra v2 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking and Fugu Ultra v2
BenchmarkQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingFugu Ultra v2Leader
AA Intelligence Index9.5Not measuredOnly Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking$0.0008Fits in one request
Fugu Ultra v2$0.020Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking$0.018Fits in one request
Fugu Ultra v2$0.340Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking$0.068Fits in one request
Fugu Ultra v2$1.30Fits in one request

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking and Fugu Ultra v2
SpecificationQwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingSakana Fugu Ultra v2
MakerQwenSakana
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 6, 2025September 11, 2026
Context window262K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.29$5.00
Output $/Mtok$1.00$30.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking better than Fugu Ultra v2 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking for output tokens 30.0x cheaper ($1.00 vs $30.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking or Fugu Ultra v2?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking costs $0.29 per million input tokens and $1.00 per million output tokens; Fugu Ultra v2 costs $5.00 and $30.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking or Fugu Ultra v2?

Fugu Ultra v2, with 1M tokens against 262K.

Has any benchmark tested both Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking and Fugu Ultra v2?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking has results on AA Intelligence Index; Fugu Ultra v2 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 23, 2026.

Compare next