Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct vs Step 3.5 Flash

Step 3.5 Flash leads Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 17.0 to 9.9, and Step 3.5 Flash costs 6.3x less per output token ($0.30 vs $1.90 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 35 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.90
28
Step 3.5 FlashStepFun
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.30
7
vs boards won of 35 shared

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct or Step 3.5 Flash: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
35
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct only
14
Step 3.5 Flash only
0
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct not benchmarked, Step 3.5 Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 40.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 54.1% against Step 3.5 Flash 94.4%, 40.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct $1.90 against Step 3.5 Flash $0.30 per million output tokens, 6.3x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructBarsStep 3.5 FlashTies
Coding21
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning32
Math11
Knowledge40
General181
All shared boards287
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index21
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructStep 3.5 FlashLeader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)64.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)11.4%32.6%Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: coding14381436Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: software and IT14421434Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructStep 3.5 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index9.917.0Step 3.5 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructStep 3.5 FlashLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom54.1%94.4%Step 3.5 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index32
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructStep 3.5 FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)77.2%83.1%Step 3.5 Flash
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)11.9%24.5%Step 3.5 Flash
LMArena Text: hard prompts14281411Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: expert14421421Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14391421Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: diagrams1255Not measuredOnly Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: homework1277Not measuredOnly Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Math benchmarks for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructStep 3.5 FlashLeader
AA Math Index88.3Not measuredOnly Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)88.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math14251408Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: mathematical work14191421Step 3.5 Flash
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructStep 3.5 FlashLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)83.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science14441415Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14311408Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: legal and government14381408Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: business and finance14331394Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructStep 3.5 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index181
General benchmarks for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructStep 3.5 FlashLeader
IFBench56.5%66.5%Step 3.5 Flash
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)63.7%63.0%Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text14201403Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: instruction following14061385Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: creative writing13661357Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision1247Not measuredOnly Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: English14291417Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: non-English14051385Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Chinese14631446Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: German14241405Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Japanese13851353Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Korean13941351Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: French14521421Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Spanish14281419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Russian14081385Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Polish14191389Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: multi-turn14281404Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: longer queries14191402Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: writing and language13921372Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13681360Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: English1256Not measuredOnly Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1283Not measuredOnly Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1253Not measuredOnly Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: humor1209Not measuredOnly Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1281Not measuredOnly Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1249Not measuredOnly Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1220Not measuredOnly Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructStep 3.5 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request
Step 3.5 Flash$0.0003Fits in one request

Step 3.5 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.016Fits in one request
Step 3.5 Flash$0.0059Fits in one request

Step 3.5 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.061Fits in one request
Step 3.5 Flash$0.023Fits in one request

Step 3.5 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct and Step 3.5 Flash
SpecificationQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructStepFun Step 3.5 Flash
MakerQwenStepFun
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 23, 2025January 29, 2026
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.21$0.10
Output $/Mtok$1.90$0.30
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct better than Step 3.5 Flash for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct or Step 3.5 Flash?

Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.21 per million input tokens and $1.90 per million output tokens; Step 3.5 Flash costs $0.10 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct or Step 3.5 Flash?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct vs Step 3.5 Flash comparison based on?

35 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Step 3.5 Flash's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next