Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Beam 1.0 501B A23B cost about the same per output token ($1.20 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 23 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.20
1
R Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflection
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.20
22
vs boards won of 23 shared

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking or Beam 1.0 501B A23B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
23
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking only
7
Beam 1.0 501B A23B only
5
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking not benchmarked, Beam 1.0 501B A23B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 12.4 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: French: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking 1351 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1461, 18.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Both cost $1.20 per million output tokens.
Context window
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking takes 262K tokens, Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingBarsBeam 1.0 501B A23BTies
Coding02
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge13
General012
All shared boards122
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1437Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
AA Coding Index17.4Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: coding13921473Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: software and IT13931461Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1443Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1436Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AA Intelligence Index11.2Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Neither model has a result on 42 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
LMArena Text: hard prompts13711442Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: expert13761447Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13841451Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
LMArena Text: math13991459Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: mathematical work13901475Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
LMArena Text: science13841430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13921376Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
LMArena Text: legal and government13641433Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: business and finance13601430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1245Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1220Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index012
General benchmarks for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
LMArena Text13681425Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: instruction following13441430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: creative writing13141390Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: English13921436Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: non-English13421413Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: Chinese14071424Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: German1356Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1280Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: Korean1310Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: French13511461Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: Spanish1358Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: Russian13371412Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: Polish1345Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13461414Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: longer queries13531429Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: writing and language13301400Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13121399Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking$0.0008Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.0010Fits in one request

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking$0.011Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.024Fits in one request

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking$0.042Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.092Fits in one request

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
SpecificationQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingReflection Beam 1.0 501B A23B
MakerQwenReflection
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 11, 2025October 16, 2026
Context window262K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.40
Output $/Mtok$1.20$1.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking better than Beam 1.0 501B A23B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs $0.40 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Beam 1.0 501B A23B, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B comparison based on?

23 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Beam 1.0 501B A23B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next