Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Solar Pro 4

Solar Pro 4 leads Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 28.2 to 9.6, and Solar Pro 4 costs 1.8x less per output token ($0.60 vs $1.10 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 32 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.10
26
Solar Pro 4Upstage
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
6
vs boards won of 32 shared

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct or Solar Pro 4: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct for work measured by AA Intelligence Index or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
32
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct only
9
Solar Pro 4 only
13
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct not benchmarked, Solar Pro 4 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 18.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct 9.6 against Solar Pro 4 28.2, 18.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct $1.10 against Solar Pro 4 $0.60 per million output tokens, 1.8x apart.
Context window
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct takes 262K tokens, Solar Pro 4 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructBarsSolar Pro 4Ties
Coding20
Intelligence01
Reasoning23
Math20
Knowledge40
General162
All shared boards266
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructSolar Pro 4Leader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1371Only Solar Pro 4 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured52.7Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)78.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
SciCodeNot measured48.0%Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)9.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
ALE-BenchNot measured179.3Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: coding14401438Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: software and IT14471431Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1363Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1371Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructSolar Pro 4Leader
AA Intelligence Index9.628.2Solar Pro 4
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructSolar Pro 4Leader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1105Only Solar Pro 4 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom41.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructSolar Pro 4Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)75.9%89.1%Solar Pro 4
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)12.6%29.8%Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: hard prompts14281400Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: expert14171428Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14311427Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark66.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructSolar Pro 4Leader
AA Math Index84.3Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)84.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math14401421Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: mathematical work14341427Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructSolar Pro 4Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)82.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science14341404Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14551374Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: legal and government14311383Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: business and finance14221381Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructSolar Pro 4Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1176Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1147Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1169Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1177Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1178Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1182Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index162
General benchmarks for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructSolar Pro 4Leader
IFBench60.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)63.7%70.7%Solar Pro 4
Fiction.LiveBench55.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct measured
LMArena Text14171388Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: instruction following13881375Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: creative writing13331317Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: English14211414Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: non-English14071363Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: Chinese14601422Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: German14161358Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: Japanese13951320Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: Korean13631383Solar Pro 4
LMArena Text: French14141400Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: Spanish14351409Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: Russian14041357Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: Polish13981304Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: multi-turn14161385Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: longer queries14021382Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: writing and language13551344Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13491332Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructSolar Pro 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct$0.0006Fits in one request
Solar Pro 4$0.0004Fits in one request

Solar Pro 4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct$0.0083Fits in one request
Solar Pro 4$0.0093Fits in one request

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct$0.031Fits in one request
Solar Pro 4$0.036Fits in one request

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct and Solar Pro 4
SpecificationQwen3 Next 80B A3B InstructUpstage Solar Pro 4
MakerQwenUpstage
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 11, 2025August 10, 2026
Context window262K524K
Input $/Mtok$0.10$0.15
Output $/Mtok$1.10$0.60
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct better than Solar Pro 4 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct for work measured by AA Intelligence Index or GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct or Solar Pro 4?

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct costs $0.10 per million input tokens and $1.10 per million output tokens; Solar Pro 4 costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct or Solar Pro 4?

Solar Pro 4, with 524K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct vs Solar Pro 4 comparison based on?

32 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Solar Pro 4's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next