Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Solar Pro 4
Solar Pro 4 leads Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 28.2 to 11.9, and Solar Pro 4 costs 2.5x less per output token ($0.60 vs $1.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 41 benchmarks have a result for both.
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B or Solar Pro 4: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B for work measured by LMArena WebDev or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 41
- Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B only
- 12
- Solar Pro 4 only
- 4
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Solar Pro 4
Solar Pro 4 leads, 28.2 against 11.9.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
Solar Pro 4
Solar Pro 4 leads, 1176 against 1158.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Solar Pro 4
Solar Pro 4 takes 524K tokens against 262K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Solar Pro 4
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B $0.0010, Solar Pro 4 $0.0004 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B not benchmarked, Solar Pro 4 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Intelligence, 16.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run): Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B 61.8% against Solar Pro 4 89.1%, 27.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B $1.50 against Solar Pro 4 $0.60 per million output tokens, 2.5x apart.
- Context window
- Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B takes 262K tokens, Solar Pro 4 524K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B | Bars | Solar Pro 4 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 1 | 5 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 5 | ||
| Math | 0 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 4 | ||
| Web design | 0 | 5 | ||
| General | 3 | 15 | ||
| All shared boards | 4 | 37 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index15
| Benchmark | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified | 69.6% | Not measured | Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured |
| LMArena WebDev | 1275 | 1371 | Solar Pro 4 |
| AA Coding Index | Not measured | 52.7 | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 58.5% | Not measured | Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured |
| SciCode | Not measured | 48.0% | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 18.9% | Not measured | Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured |
| Terminal-Bench | 27.2% | Not measured | Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured |
| GSO-Bench | 4.9% | Not measured | Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured |
| WeirdML | 41.2% | Not measured | Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured |
| ALE-Bench | 461.4 | 179.3 | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1412 | 1438 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1393 | 1431 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1257 | 1363 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1287 | 1371 | Solar Pro 4 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 11.9 | 28.2 | Solar Pro 4 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: agents building web apps | Not measured | 1105 | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 43.6% | Not measured | Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 61.8% | 89.1% | Solar Pro 4 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 4.5% | 29.8% | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1372 | 1400 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1338 | 1428 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1380 | 1427 | Solar Pro 4 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 49.5% | Not measured | Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | 39.3 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 39.3% | Not measured | Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1365 | 1421 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1367 | 1427 | Solar Pro 4 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
| Benchmark | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 78.8% | Not measured | Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1347 | 1404 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1347 | 1374 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1358 | 1383 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1343 | 1381 | Solar Pro 4 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1158 | 1176 | Solar Pro 4 |
| Design Arena: UI components | 1110 | 1147 | Solar Pro 4 |
| Design Arena: game dev | 1098 | 1169 | Solar Pro 4 |
| Design Arena: data viz | 1084 | 1177 | Solar Pro 4 |
| Design Arena: 3D | Not measured | 1178 | Only Solar Pro 4 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1142 | 1182 | Solar Pro 4 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index315
| Benchmark | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 40.5% | Not measured | Only Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 45.7% | 70.7% | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text | 1357 | 1388 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1355 | 1375 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1333 | 1317 | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B |
| LMArena Text: English | 1359 | 1414 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1346 | 1363 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1357 | 1422 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1325 | 1358 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1311 | 1320 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1305 | 1383 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1398 | 1400 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1360 | 1409 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1366 | 1357 | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1344 | 1304 | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1366 | 1385 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1378 | 1382 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1340 | 1344 | Solar Pro 4 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1317 | 1332 | Solar Pro 4 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B | Solar Pro 4 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Solar Pro 4 costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Solar Pro 4 costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Solar Pro 4 costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B | Upstage Solar Pro 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Qwen | Upstage |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | July 23, 2025 | August 10, 2026 |
| Context window | 262K | 524K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.30 | $0.15 |
| Output $/Mtok | $1.50 | $0.60 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 1 | 1 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B better than Solar Pro 4 for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B for work measured by LMArena WebDev or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B or Solar Pro 4?
Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B costs $0.30 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Solar Pro 4 costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B or Solar Pro 4?
Solar Pro 4, with 524K tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks is the Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B vs Solar Pro 4 comparison based on?
41 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Solar Pro 4's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.