Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3 Coder Next vs Cydonia 24B V4.1

Cydonia 24B V4.1 costs 1.6x less per output token than Qwen3 Coder Next ($0.50 vs $0.80 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Qwen3 Coder NextQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.80
T Cydonia 24B V4.1TheDrummer
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.50
vs $0.80 vs $0.50 per 1M output tokens. Cydonia 24B V4.1 is 1.6x cheaper.

Qwen3 Coder Next or Cydonia 24B V4.1: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 Coder Next for a larger context window (262K against 131K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen3 Coder Next has results on AA Coding Index, SciCode and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run); Cydonia 24B V4.1 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3 Coder Next not benchmarked, Cydonia 24B V4.1 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Qwen3 Coder Next $0.80 against Cydonia 24B V4.1 $0.50 per million output tokens, 1.6x apart.
Context window
Qwen3 Coder Next takes 262K tokens, Cydonia 24B V4.1 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index4 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3 Coder Next and Cydonia 24B V4.1
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder NextCydonia 24B V4.1Leader
AA Coding Index36.2Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder Next measured
SciCode36.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder Next measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)18.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder Next measured
WeirdML34.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder Next measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3 Coder Next and Cydonia 24B V4.1
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder NextCydonia 24B V4.1Leader
AA Intelligence Index9.2Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder Next measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3 Coder Next and Cydonia 24B V4.1
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder NextCydonia 24B V4.1Leader
AA Agentic Index0.9Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder Next measured
τ²-Bench Telecom79.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder Next measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3 Coder Next and Cydonia 24B V4.1
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder NextCydonia 24B V4.1Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)73.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder Next measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)10.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder Next measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
General benchmarks for Qwen3 Coder Next and Cydonia 24B V4.1
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder NextCydonia 24B V4.1Leader
IFBench35.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder Next measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)47.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder Next measured
Neither model has a result on the other 46 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3 Coder Next$0.0005Fits in one request
Cydonia 24B V4.1$0.0006Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder Next costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3 Coder Next$0.0084Fits in one request
Cydonia 24B V4.1$0.017Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder Next costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3 Coder Next$0.032Fits in one request
Cydonia 24B V4.1$0.065Exceeds the context window

Qwen3 Coder Next costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3 Coder Next and Cydonia 24B V4.1
SpecificationQwen3 Coder NextTheDrummer Cydonia 24B V4.1
MakerQwenTheDrummer
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 4, 2026September 27, 2025
Context window262K131K
Input $/Mtok$0.12$0.30
Output $/Mtok$0.80$0.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3 Coder Next better than Cydonia 24B V4.1 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 Coder Next for a larger context window (262K against 131K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Coder Next or Cydonia 24B V4.1?

Qwen3 Coder Next costs $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Cydonia 24B V4.1 costs $0.30 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 Coder Next or Cydonia 24B V4.1?

Qwen3 Coder Next, with 262K tokens against 131K.

Has any benchmark tested both Qwen3 Coder Next and Cydonia 24B V4.1?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen3 Coder Next has results on AA Coding Index, SciCode and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run); Cydonia 24B V4.1 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next