Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct vs Solar Pro 3

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct leads Solar Pro 3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 9.6 to 7.8, and Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs 1.4x less per output token ($0.44 vs $0.60 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 7 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.44
3
Solar Pro 3Upstage
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
4
vs boards won of 7 shared

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct or Solar Pro 3: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct for output tokens 1.4x cheaper ($0.44 vs $0.60 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 131K tokens).

Shared results
7
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct only
9
Solar Pro 3 only
3
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct not benchmarked, Solar Pro 3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 51.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct 34.5% against Solar Pro 3 86.3%, 51.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct $0.44 against Solar Pro 3 $0.60 per million output tokens, 1.4x apart.
Context window
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct takes 262K tokens, Solar Pro 3 131K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructBarsSolar Pro 3Ties
Coding10
Intelligence10
Agentic work01
Reasoning02
General11
All shared boards34
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct and Solar Pro 3
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructSolar Pro 3Leader
SWE-bench Verified60.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
SWE-bench Lite49.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured16.2Only Solar Pro 3 measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)40.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
SciCodeNot measured25.5%Only Solar Pro 3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.2%7.6%Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct and Solar Pro 3
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructSolar Pro 3Leader
AA Intelligence Index9.67.8Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct and Solar Pro 3
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructSolar Pro 3Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.4Only Solar Pro 3 measured
τ²-Bench Telecom34.5%86.3%Solar Pro 3
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct and Solar Pro 3
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructSolar Pro 3Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)51.6%72.4%Solar Pro 3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%10.3%Solar Pro 3
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct and Solar Pro 3
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructSolar Pro 3Leader
AA Math Index29.0Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)29.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct and Solar Pro 3
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructSolar Pro 3Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)70.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct and Solar Pro 3
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructSolar Pro 3Leader
Design Arena: websites1087Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Design Arena: UI components1043Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Design Arena: data viz1085Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 6 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
General benchmarks for Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct and Solar Pro 3
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructSolar Pro 3Leader
IFBench32.7%71.2%Solar Pro 3
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)32.7%32.3%Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 44 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct and Solar Pro 3
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructSolar Pro 3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.0003Fits in one request
Solar Pro 3$0.0004Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.0068Fits in one request
Solar Pro 3$0.0093Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.026Fits in one request
Solar Pro 3$0.036Exceeds the context window

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct and Solar Pro 3
SpecificationQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructUpstage Solar Pro 3
MakerQwenUpstage
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 31, 2025January 27, 2026
Context window262K131K
Input $/Mtok$0.11$0.15
Output $/Mtok$0.44$0.60
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct better than Solar Pro 3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct for output tokens 1.4x cheaper ($0.44 vs $0.60 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 131K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct or Solar Pro 3?

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs $0.11 per million input tokens and $0.44 per million output tokens; Solar Pro 3 costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct or Solar Pro 3?

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct vs Solar Pro 3 comparison based on?

7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Solar Pro 3's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next