Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct vs Solar Mini 4

Updated October 21, 2026. 4 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
9.6
Output $/M
$0.44
0
Solar Mini 4Upstage
Coding
No data
Overall
24.1
Output $/M
$0.20
4
vs boards won of 4 shared

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct has the edge where what matters is AA Intelligence Index or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Shared results
4
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct only
12
Solar Mini 4 only
3
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct not benchmarked, Solar Mini 4 not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 50.7 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct 32.7% against Solar Mini 4 83.3%, 50.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct $0.44 against Solar Mini 4 $0.20 per million output tokens, 2.2x apart.
Context window
Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct takes 262K tokens, Solar Mini 4 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructBarsSolar Mini 4Ties
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
Web design01
General01
All shared boards04
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructSolar Mini 4Leader
SWE-bench Verified60.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
SWE-bench Lite49.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)40.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
SciCodeNot measured47.6%Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructSolar Mini 4Leader
AA Intelligence Index9.624.1Solar Mini 4
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructSolar Mini 4Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom34.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructSolar Mini 4Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)51.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)3.8%25.8%Solar Mini 4
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructSolar Mini 4Leader
AA Math Index29.0Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)29.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructSolar Mini 4Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)70.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructSolar Mini 4Leader
Design Arena: websites10871160Solar Mini 4
Design Arena: UI components1046Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1113Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: data viz1085Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1153Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 4 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructSolar Mini 4Leader
IFBench32.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)32.7%83.3%Solar Mini 4
Neither model has a result on the other 44 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructSolar Mini 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.0003Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.0001Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.0068Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.0031Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct$0.026Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.012Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct and Solar Mini 4
SpecificationQwen3 Coder 30B A3B InstructUpstage Solar Mini 4
MakerQwenUpstage
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 31, 2025September 23, 2026
Context window262K524K
Input $/Mtok$0.11$0.05
Output $/Mtok$0.44$0.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct better than Solar Mini 4 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct has the edge where what matters is AA Intelligence Index or Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run), where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct or Solar Mini 4?

Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct costs $0.11 per million input tokens and $0.44 per million output tokens; Solar Mini 4 costs $0.05 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct or Solar Mini 4?

Solar Mini 4, with 524K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct vs Solar Mini 4 comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Solar Mini 4's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next