Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs 5.0x less per output token than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B ($1.20 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
R Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflection
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.20
vs $6.00 vs $1.20 per 1M output tokens. Beam 1.0 501B A23B is 5.0x cheaper.

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Beam 1.0 501B A23B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has results on AA Coding Index, SciCode and AA Intelligence Index; Beam 1.0 501B A23B on LMArena WebDev, LMArena Text: coding and LMArena Text: software and IT. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B not benchmarked, Beam 1.0 501B A23B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B $6.00 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B $1.20 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
Context window
Both take 1.05M tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index7 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkQwen3.8 2.4T A95BBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1436Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
AA Coding Index71.9Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
SciCode54.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1472Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1461Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1441Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1438Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkQwen3.8 2.4T A95BBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AA Intelligence Index39.9Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkQwen3.8 2.4T A95BBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AA Agentic Index50.1Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
MCP Atlas84.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkQwen3.8 2.4T A95BBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)93.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)42.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1442Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1447Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1452Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkQwen3.8 2.4T A95BBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1460Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1474Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
MathArena31.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkQwen3.8 2.4T A95BBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1431Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1378Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1431Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1430Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkQwen3.8 2.4T A95BBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1247Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1212Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index13 boards measured
General benchmarks for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkQwen3.8 2.4T A95BBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
LMArena TextNot measured1426Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1431Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1391Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1437Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1412Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1428Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1461Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1411Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1416Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1429Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1401Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1400Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B$0.0050Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.0010Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B$0.118Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.024Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B$0.460Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.092Fits in one request

Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
SpecificationQwen3.8 2.4T A95BReflection Beam 1.0 501B A23B
MakerQwenReflection
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedAugust 12, 2026October 16, 2026
Context window1.05M1.05M
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.40
Output $/Mtok$6.00$1.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B better than Beam 1.0 501B A23B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs $0.40 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Neither: both take 1.05M tokens.

Has any benchmark tested both Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has results on AA Coding Index, SciCode and AA Intelligence Index; Beam 1.0 501B A23B on LMArena WebDev, LMArena Text: coding and LMArena Text: software and IT. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 23, 2026.

Compare next