Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B vs Qwen3 Coder Flash

Qwen3 Coder Flash costs 6.2x less per output token than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B ($0.975 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Replace Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B Replace Qwen3 Coder Flash
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
Qwen3 Coder FlashQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.975
vs $6.00 vs $0.975 per 1M output tokens. Qwen3 Coder Flash is 6.2x cheaper.

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Qwen3 Coder Flash: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B for a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Model AQwen3.8 2.4T A95BQwenNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BQwen3 Coder FlashQwenNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has results on AA Coding Index, SciCode and AA Intelligence Index; Qwen3 Coder Flash has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B not benchmarked, Qwen3 Coder Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B $6.00 against Qwen3 Coder Flash $0.975 per million output tokens, 6.2x apart.
Context window
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3 Coder Flash 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index2 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Qwen3 Coder Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.8 2.4T A95BQwen3 Coder FlashLeader
AA Coding Index71.9Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
SciCode54.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Qwen3 Coder Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.8 2.4T A95BQwen3 Coder FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index39.9Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Qwen3 Coder Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.8 2.4T A95BQwen3 Coder FlashLeader
AA Agentic Index50.1Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Qwen3 Coder Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.8 2.4T A95BQwen3 Coder FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)93.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)42.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 20 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
General benchmarks for Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Qwen3 Coder Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.8 2.4T A95BQwen3 Coder FlashLeader
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)80.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 45 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B$0.0050Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder Flash$0.0007Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B$0.118Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder Flash$0.013Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B$0.460Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder Flash$0.049Fits in one request

Qwen3 Coder Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Qwen3 Coder Flash
SpecificationQwen3.8 2.4T A95BQwen3 Coder Flash
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedAugust 12, 2026September 17, 2025
Context window1.05M1M
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.195
Output $/Mtok$6.00$0.975
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B better than Qwen3 Coder Flash for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B for a larger context window (1.05M against 1M tokens).

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Qwen3 Coder Flash?

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $6.00 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Flash costs $0.195 and $0.975. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B or Qwen3 Coder Flash?

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B, with 1.05M tokens against 1M.

Has any benchmark tested both Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B and Qwen3 Coder Flash?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has results on AA Coding Index, SciCode and AA Intelligence Index; Qwen3 Coder Flash has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next