Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Hy-MT2-1.8B

Hy-MT2-1.8B costs 8.8x less per output token than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 ($0.177 vs $1.56 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.56
Hy-MT2-1.8BTencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.177
vs $1.56 vs $0.177 per 1M output tokens. Hy-MT2-1.8B is 8.8x cheaper.

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 or Hy-MT2-1.8B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 for a larger context window (1M against 8K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 has results on Design Arena: websites, Design Arena: UI components and Design Arena: game dev; Hy-MT2-1.8B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 not benchmarked, Hy-MT2-1.8B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 $1.56 against Hy-MT2-1.8B $0.177 per million output tokens, 8.8x apart.
Context window
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 takes 1M tokens, Hy-MT2-1.8B 8K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and Hy-MT2-1.8B
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Hy-MT2-1.8BLeader
Design Arena: websites1187Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: UI components1175Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: game dev1105Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: data viz1135Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: 3D1118Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1166Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: SVG1107Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1094Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15$0.0010Fits in one request
Hy-MT2-1.8B$0.0001Fits in one request

Hy-MT2-1.8B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15$0.018Fits in one request
Hy-MT2-1.8B$0.0027Exceeds the context window

Hy-MT2-1.8B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15$0.068Fits in one request
Hy-MT2-1.8B$0.011Exceeds the context window

Hy-MT2-1.8B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and Hy-MT2-1.8B
SpecificationQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Tencent Hy-MT2-1.8B
MakerQwenTencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 16, 2026August 20, 2026
Context window1M8K
Input $/Mtok$0.26$0.044
Output $/Mtok$1.56$0.177
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 better than Hy-MT2-1.8B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 for a larger context window (1M against 8K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 or Hy-MT2-1.8B?

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs $0.26 per million input tokens and $1.56 per million output tokens; Hy-MT2-1.8B costs $0.044 and $0.177. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 or Hy-MT2-1.8B?

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15, with 1M tokens against 8K.

Has any benchmark tested both Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and Hy-MT2-1.8B?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 has results on Design Arena: websites, Design Arena: UI components and Design Arena: game dev; Hy-MT2-1.8B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next