Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 vs Step 3.5 Flash

Step 3.5 Flash costs 5.2x less per output token than Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 ($0.30 vs $1.56 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.56
Step 3.5 FlashStepFun
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.30
vs $1.56 vs $0.30 per 1M output tokens. Step 3.5 Flash is 5.2x cheaper.

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 or Step 3.5 Flash: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 for a larger context window (1M against 262K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 has results on Design Arena: websites, Design Arena: UI components and Design Arena: game dev; Step 3.5 Flash on Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), LMArena Text: coding and LMArena Text: software and IT. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 not benchmarked, Step 3.5 Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 $1.56 against Step 3.5 Flash $0.30 per million output tokens, 5.2x apart.
Context window
Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 takes 1M tokens, Step 3.5 Flash 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index3 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Step 3.5 FlashLeader
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured32.6%Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1436Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1434Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Step 3.5 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured17.0Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Step 3.5 FlashLeader
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured94.4%Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Step 3.5 FlashLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.1%Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured24.5%Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1411Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1421Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1421Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Step 3.5 FlashLeader
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1408Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1421Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Step 3.5 FlashLeader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1415Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1408Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1408Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1394Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Step 3.5 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites1187Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: UI components1178Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: game dev1105Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: data viz1135Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: 3D1119Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1167Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: SVG1108Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Design Arena: ASCII art1094Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards measured
General benchmarks for Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15Step 3.5 FlashLeader
IFBenchNot measured66.5%Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured63.0%Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena TextNot measured1403Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1385Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1357Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1417Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1385Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1446Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1405Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1353Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1351Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1421Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1419Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1385Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1389Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1404Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1402Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1372Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1360Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15$0.0010Fits in one request
Step 3.5 Flash$0.0003Fits in one request

Step 3.5 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15$0.018Fits in one request
Step 3.5 Flash$0.0059Fits in one request

Step 3.5 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15$0.068Fits in one request
Step 3.5 Flash$0.023Fits in one request

Step 3.5 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and Step 3.5 Flash
SpecificationQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15StepFun Step 3.5 Flash
MakerQwenStepFun
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 16, 2026January 29, 2026
Context window1M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.26$0.10
Output $/Mtok$1.56$0.30
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 better than Step 3.5 Flash for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 for a larger context window (1M against 262K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 or Step 3.5 Flash?

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 costs $0.26 per million input tokens and $1.56 per million output tokens; Step 3.5 Flash costs $0.10 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 or Step 3.5 Flash?

Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15, with 1M tokens against 262K.

Has any benchmark tested both Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 and Step 3.5 Flash?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 has results on Design Arena: websites, Design Arena: UI components and Design Arena: game dev; Step 3.5 Flash on Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run), LMArena Text: coding and LMArena Text: software and IT. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next