LLMBenchmark.ai

Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.5-27B vs Hy3

Updated October 21, 2026. 35 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

Qwen3.5-27BQwen
Coding
22.6
Overall
22.9
Output $/M
$2.16
0
Hy3Tencent
Coding
43.9
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.528
35
vs boards won of 35 shared

Decision reading

Pick Hy3 for coding: it scores 43.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.6 for Qwen3.5-27B.

Qwen3.5-27B is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Shared results
35
Qwen3.5-27B only
18
Hy3 only
9
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.5-27B 22.6 from 1 benchmark, Hy3 43.9 from 1 benchmark.
Widest category
Coding, 15.6 points apart on average over 6 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena WebDev: React: Qwen3.5-27B 1346 against Hy3 1511, 27.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.5-27B $2.16 against Hy3 $0.528 per million output tokens, 4.1x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.5-27BBarsHy3Ties
Coding06
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General018
All shared boards035
CodingLike-for-likeFour of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index06
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BHy3Leader
LMArena WebDev13581507Hy3
SciCodeNot measured48.6%Only Hy3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
WeirdML39.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
ALE-Bench349.4838.6Hy3
LMArena Text: coding14271466Hy3
LMArena Text: software and IT14311463Hy3
LMArena WebDev: React13461511Hy3
LMArena WebDev: HTML13861487Hy3
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BHy3Leader
AA Intelligence Index22.9Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BHy3Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom93.9%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Vending-Bench 2$202Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BHy3Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)85.8%89.7%Hy3
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)23.9%33.5%Hy3
LMArena Text: hard prompts14151447Hy3
LMArena Text: expert14271461Hy3
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14291455Hy3
LMArena Vision: diagrams1249Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: homework1256Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BHy3Leader
LMArena Text: math14291473Hy3
LMArena Text: mathematical work14291482Hy3
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BHy3Leader
LMArena Text: science14371457Hy3
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14251452Hy3
LMArena Text: legal and government14051422Hy3
LMArena Text: business and finance13991424Hy3
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BHy3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1230Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1205Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1208Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1163Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1233Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1227Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1199Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1157Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index018
General benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BHy3Leader
IFBench75.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.7%79.0%Hy3
DTBench82.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMCA34.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text14091438Hy3
LMArena Text: instruction following13931426Hy3
LMArena Text: creative writing13621403Hy3
LMArena Vision1241Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: English14251448Hy3
LMArena Text: non-English13901426Hy3
LMArena Text: Chinese14781485Hy3
LMArena Text: German13921449Hy3
LMArena Text: Japanese13461397Hy3
LMArena Text: Korean13591396Hy3
LMArena Text: French14101456Hy3
LMArena Text: Spanish14071457Hy3
LMArena Text: Russian13901432Hy3
LMArena Text: Polish13751447Hy3
LMArena Text: multi-turn14101436Hy3
LMArena Text: longer queries14131442Hy3
LMArena Text: writing and language13801414Hy3
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13631400Hy3
LMArena Vision: English1246Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1301Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1246Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: humor1227Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1170Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1210Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1224Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Hy3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BHy3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.5-27B$0.0014Fits in one request
Hy3$0.0004Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.5-27B$0.020Fits in one request
Hy3$0.0082Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.5-27B$0.076Fits in one request
Hy3$0.032Fits in one request

Hy3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.5-27B and Hy3
SpecificationQwen3.5-27BTencent Hy3
MakerQwenTencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 25, 2026July 6, 2026
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.27$0.132
Output $/Mtok$2.16$0.528
Coding index22.643.9
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.5-27B better than Hy3 for coding?

Pick Hy3 for coding: it scores 43.9 on the Vibe Coding Index against 22.6 for Qwen3.5-27B. Qwen3.5-27B is neither cheaper nor larger in context, and leads no benchmark both models were measured on.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-27B or Hy3?

Qwen3.5-27B costs $0.27 per million input tokens and $2.16 per million output tokens; Hy3 costs $0.132 and $0.528. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5-27B or Hy3?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.5-27B vs Hy3 comparison based on?

35 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Qwen3.5-27B's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Hy3's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next