Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.5-27B vs Reka Flash 3

Qwen3.5-27B leads Reka Flash 3 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 22.9 to 6.4, and Reka Flash 3 costs 7.8x less per output token ($0.20 vs $1.56 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 7 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3.5-27BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.56
7
Reka Flash 3Reka
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
0
vs boards won of 7 shared

Qwen3.5-27B or Reka Flash 3: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3.5-27B for a larger context window (262K against 66K tokens).

Shared results
7
Qwen3.5-27B only
47
Reka Flash 3 only
5
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.5-27B not benchmarked, Reka Flash 3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 93.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Qwen3.5-27B 93.9% against Reka Flash 3 0.0%, 93.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.5-27B $1.56 against Reka Flash 3 $0.20 per million output tokens, 7.8x apart.
Context window
Qwen3.5-27B takes 262K tokens, Reka Flash 3 66K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.5-27BBarsReka Flash 3Ties
Coding10
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning20
General20
All shared boards70
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index10
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Reka Flash 3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BReka Flash 3Leader
LMArena WebDev1358Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured43.5%Only Reka Flash 3 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%0.0%Qwen3.5-27B
WeirdML39.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
ALE-Bench349.4Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: coding1427Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1431Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena WebDev: React1346Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1386Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Reka Flash 3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BReka Flash 3Leader
AA Intelligence Index22.96.4Qwen3.5-27B
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Reka Flash 3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BReka Flash 3Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom93.9%0.0%Qwen3.5-27B
BALROGNot measured29.2%Only Reka Flash 3 measured
Vending-Bench 2$202Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Reka Flash 3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BReka Flash 3Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)85.8%52.9%Qwen3.5-27B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)23.9%4.4%Qwen3.5-27B
LMArena Text: hard prompts1415Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: expert1427Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1429Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1249Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: homework1256Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Reka Flash 3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BReka Flash 3Leader
AA Math IndexNot measured33.7Only Reka Flash 3 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured33.7%Only Reka Flash 3 measured
LMArena Text: math1429Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1429Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
MathArena15.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Reka Flash 3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BReka Flash 3Leader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured66.9%Only Reka Flash 3 measured
LMArena Text: science1437Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1425Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1405Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1399Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Reka Flash 3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BReka Flash 3Leader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
General benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Reka Flash 3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BReka Flash 3Leader
IFBench75.6%30.4%Qwen3.5-27B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.7%0.0%Qwen3.5-27B
DTBench82.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMCA34.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text1409Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1393Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1362Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision1241Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: English1425Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: non-English1390Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1478Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: German1392Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1346Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: Korean1359Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: French1410Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1407Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: Russian1390Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: Polish1375Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1410Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1413Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1380Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1363Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: English1246Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1301Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1246Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: humor1227Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: captioning1170Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing things1210Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1224Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Reka Flash 3
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BReka Flash 3Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.5-27B$0.0010Fits in one request
Reka Flash 3$0.0002Fits in one request

Reka Flash 3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.5-27B$0.014Fits in one request
Reka Flash 3$0.0056Fits in one request

Reka Flash 3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.5-27B$0.055Fits in one request
Reka Flash 3$0.022Exceeds the context window

Reka Flash 3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.5-27B and Reka Flash 3
SpecificationQwen3.5-27BReka Flash 3
MakerQwenReka
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 25, 2026March 12, 2025
Context window262K66K
Input $/Mtok$0.195$0.10
Output $/Mtok$1.56$0.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.5-27B better than Reka Flash 3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.5-27B for a larger context window (262K against 66K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-27B or Reka Flash 3?

Qwen3.5-27B costs $0.195 per million input tokens and $1.56 per million output tokens; Reka Flash 3 costs $0.10 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5-27B or Reka Flash 3?

Qwen3.5-27B, with 262K tokens against 66K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.5-27B vs Reka Flash 3 comparison based on?

7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3.5-27B's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Reka Flash 3's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next