Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.5-27B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct

Qwen3.5-27B leads Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 22.9 to 9.9, and Qwen3.5-27B costs 1.2x less per output token ($1.56 vs $1.90 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 45 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3.5-27BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.56
13
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.90
32
vs boards won of 45 shared

Qwen3.5-27B or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3.5-27B for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($1.56 vs $1.90 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
45
Qwen3.5-27B only
9
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct only
4
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.5-27B not benchmarked, Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 39.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Qwen3.5-27B 93.9% against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct 54.1%, 39.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.5-27B $1.56 against Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct $1.90 per million output tokens, 1.2x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.5-27BBarsQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructTies
Coding12
Intelligence10
Agentic work10
Reasoning25
Math20
Knowledge04
General621
All shared boards1332
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index12
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
LMArena WebDev1358Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured64.6%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)32.6%11.4%Qwen3.5-27B
WeirdML39.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
ALE-Bench349.4Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: coding14271438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: software and IT14311442Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena WebDev: React1346Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1386Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index22.99.9Qwen3.5-27B
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom93.9%54.1%Qwen3.5-27B
Vending-Bench 2$202Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index25
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)85.8%77.2%Qwen3.5-27B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)23.9%11.9%Qwen3.5-27B
LMArena Text: hard prompts14151428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: expert14271442Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14291439Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: diagrams12491255Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: homework12561277Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
AA Math IndexNot measured88.3Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured88.3%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: math14291425Qwen3.5-27B
LMArena Text: mathematical work14291419Qwen3.5-27B
MathArena15.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.6%Only Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct measured
LMArena Text: science14371444Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14251431Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: legal and government14051438Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: business and finance13991433Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index621
General benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
IFBench75.6%56.5%Qwen3.5-27B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)77.7%63.7%Qwen3.5-27B
DTBench82.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMCA34.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text14091420Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: instruction following13931406Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: creative writing13621366Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision12411247Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: English14251429Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: non-English13901405Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Chinese14781463Qwen3.5-27B
LMArena Text: German13921424Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Japanese13461385Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Korean13591394Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: French14101452Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Spanish14071428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Russian13901408Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: Polish13751419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: multi-turn14101428Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: longer queries14131419Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: writing and language13801392Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13631368Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: English12461256Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: Chinese13011283Qwen3.5-27B
LMArena Vision: reading text12461253Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: humor12271209Qwen3.5-27B
LMArena Vision: captioning11701281Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: recognizing things12101249Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
LMArena Vision: creative writing12241220Qwen3.5-27B
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.5-27B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
BenchmarkQwen3.5-27BQwen3 VL 235B A22B InstructLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.5-27B$0.0010Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.0012Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.5-27B$0.014Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.016Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.5-27B$0.055Fits in one request
Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct$0.061Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.5-27B and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
SpecificationQwen3.5-27BQwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 25, 2026September 23, 2025
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.195$0.21
Output $/Mtok$1.56$1.90
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.5-27B better than Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.5-27B for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($1.56 vs $1.90 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-27B or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Qwen3.5-27B costs $0.195 per million input tokens and $1.56 per million output tokens; Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct costs $0.21 and $1.90. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5-27B or Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.5-27B vs Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct comparison based on?

45 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3.5-27B's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Instruct's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next