Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Solar Mini 4

Solar Mini 4 leads Qwen3.5-122B-A10B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 24.1 to 17.7, and Solar Mini 4 costs 10.4x less per output token ($0.20 vs $2.08 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3.5-122B-A10BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.08
0
Solar Mini 4Upstage
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.20
4
vs boards won of 4 shared

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Solar Mini 4: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B for work measured by SciCode or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
4
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only
47
Solar Mini 4 only
4
Like-for-like categories
4 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B not benchmarked, Solar Mini 4 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Coding, 7.9 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
SciCode: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 39.7% against Solar Mini 4 47.6%, 7.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B $2.08 against Solar Mini 4 $0.20 per million output tokens, 10.4x apart.
Context window
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B takes 262K tokens, Solar Mini 4 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3.5-122B-A10BBarsSolar Mini 4Ties
Coding01
Intelligence01
Reasoning01
General01
All shared boards04
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5-122B-A10BSolar Mini 4Leader
LMArena WebDev1361Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
AA Coding Index43.3Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
SciCode39.7%47.6%Solar Mini 4
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)31.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: coding1436Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1436Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena WebDev: React1353Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTML1351Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5-122B-A10BSolar Mini 4Leader
AA Intelligence Index17.724.1Solar Mini 4
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5-122B-A10BSolar Mini 4Leader
τ²-Bench Telecom93.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5-122B-A10BSolar Mini 4Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)85.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)25.2%25.8%Solar Mini 4
Mystery game puzzles17.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1421Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: expert1431Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1431Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision: diagrams1249Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision: homework1261Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5-122B-A10BSolar Mini 4Leader
LMArena Text: math1431Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1431Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5-122B-A10BSolar Mini 4Leader
LMArena Text: science1432Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1423Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1422Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1414Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5-122B-A10BSolar Mini 4Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1159Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1073Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1105Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1149Only Solar Mini 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 5 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5-122B-A10BSolar Mini 4Leader
IFBench75.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)76.3%83.3%Solar Mini 4
DTBench84.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMCA32.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text1417Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1399Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1368Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision1244Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: English1428Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: non-English1401Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1463Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: German1425Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1367Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: Korean1353Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: French1443Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1425Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: Russian1400Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: Polish1398Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1416Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1410Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1387Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1366Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision: English1249Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision: Chinese1301Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision: reading text1251Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision: humor1243Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writing1220Not measuredOnly Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Solar Mini 4
BenchmarkQwen3.5-122B-A10BSolar Mini 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B$0.0013Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.0001Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B$0.019Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.0031Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B$0.073Fits in one request
Solar Mini 4$0.012Fits in one request

Solar Mini 4 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3.5-122B-A10B and Solar Mini 4
SpecificationQwen3.5-122B-A10BUpstage Solar Mini 4
MakerQwenUpstage
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedFebruary 25, 2026September 23, 2026
Context window262K524K
Input $/Mtok$0.26$0.05
Output $/Mtok$2.08$0.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B better than Solar Mini 4 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B for work measured by SciCode or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Solar Mini 4?

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs $0.26 per million input tokens and $2.08 per million output tokens; Solar Mini 4 costs $0.05 and $0.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Solar Mini 4?

Solar Mini 4, with 524K tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Solar Mini 4 comparison based on?

4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Solar Mini 4's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next