Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B leads Qwen3.5-122B-A10B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 39.9 to 17.7, and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs 2.9x less per output token ($2.08 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 6 benchmarks have a result for both.
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B for output tokens 2.9x cheaper ($2.08 vs $6.00 per million) and work measured by AA Coding Index or SciCode, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 6
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only
- 45
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B only
- 3
- Like-for-like categories
- 4 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B leads, 39.9 against 17.7.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B has a AA Agentic Index result, 50.1.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B takes 1.05M tokens against 262K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B $0.0013, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B $0.0050 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B not benchmarked, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Intelligence, 22.2 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- AA Coding Index: Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 43.3 against Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B 71.9, 28.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B $2.08 against Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B $6.00 per million output tokens, 2.9x apart.
- Context window
- Qwen3.5-122B-A10B takes 262K tokens, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Bars | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 2 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 2 | ||
| General | 0 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 6 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1361 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| AA Coding Index | 43.3 | 71.9 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
| SciCode | 39.7% | 54.1% | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 31.1% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1436 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1436 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena WebDev: React | 1353 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena WebDev: HTML | 1351 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 35 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 17.7 | 39.9 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | Not measured | 50.1 | Only Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 93.6% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| MCP Atlas | Not measured | 84.5% | Only Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 85.7% | 93.5% | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 25.2% | 42.4% | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
| Mystery game puzzles | 17.0% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1421 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1431 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1431 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Vision: diagrams | 1249 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Vision: homework | 1261 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text: math | 1431 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1431 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| MathArena | Not measured | 31.6% | Only Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text: science | 1432 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1423 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1422 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1414 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 9 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 75.7% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 76.3% | 80.3% | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
| DTBench | 84.3% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMCA | 32.2% | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Text | 1417 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1399 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1368 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Vision | 1244 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1428 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1401 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1463 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Text: German | 1425 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1367 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1353 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1443 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1425 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1400 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1398 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1416 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1410 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1387 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1366 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Vision: English | 1249 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Vision: Chinese | 1301 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Vision: reading text | 1251 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Vision: humor | 1243 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| LMArena Vision: creative writing | 1220 | Not measured | Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Qwen | Qwen |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | February 25, 2026 | August 12, 2026 |
| Context window | 262K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.26 | $2.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $2.08 | $6.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 1 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Qwen3.5-122B-A10B better than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3.5-122B-A10B for output tokens 2.9x cheaper ($2.08 vs $6.00 per million) and work measured by AA Coding Index or SciCode, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs $0.26 per million input tokens and $2.08 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks is the Qwen3.5-122B-A10B vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B comparison based on?
6 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.