Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Hy3 preview

Hy3 preview leads Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 25.3 to 7.5, and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs 2.0x less per output token ($0.30 vs $0.60 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 31 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
41.5
Output $/M
$0.30
1
Hy3 previewTencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
30
vs boards won of 31 shared

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 or Hy3 preview: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($0.30 vs $0.60 per million) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Shared results
31
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 only
14
Hy3 preview only
5
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 not benchmarked, Hy3 preview not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 64.6 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 28.1% against Hy3 preview 92.7%, 64.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 $0.30 against Hy3 preview $0.60 per million output tokens, 2.0x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507BarsHy3 previewTies
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning05
Math02
Knowledge04
General114
All shared boards130
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Hy3 previewLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1357Only Hy3 preview measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured58.8Only Hy3 preview measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)70.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
SciCode33.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.1%34.1%Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: coding14161421Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: software and IT14171423Hy3 preview
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1349Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1356Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Hy3 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.525.3Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Hy3 previewLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured24.1Only Hy3 preview measured
τ²-Bench Telecom28.1%92.7%Hy3 preview
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)41.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Hy3 previewLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)70.7%86.7%Hy3 preview
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)10.3%27.8%Hy3 preview
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)55.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13981413Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: expert13971422Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14061416Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Hy3 previewLeader
AA Math Index66.3Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)66.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
OTIS Mock AIME62.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: math13941424Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: mathematical work14111442Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Hy3 previewLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)80.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: science13931416Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13921405Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: legal and government13871430Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: business and finance13891397Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Hy3 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index114
General benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Hy3 previewLeader
IFBench50.7%63.1%Hy3 preview
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)61.3%64.7%Hy3 preview
DTBench67.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMCA22.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text13841401Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: instruction following13631383Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: creative writing13171339Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: English13911409Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: non-English13721390Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: Chinese14321435Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: German1379Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1337Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1330Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: French14191425Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: Spanish14041399Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: Russian13691399Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: Polish1353Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13781411Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: longer queries13781402Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: writing and language13361370Hy3 preview
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13341352Hy3 preview
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Hy3 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.0002Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.0005Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.0054Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.011Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.021Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.042Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Hy3 preview
SpecificationQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Tencent Hy3 preview
MakerQwenTencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 29, 2025April 22, 2026
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.09$0.18
Output $/Mtok$0.30$0.60
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 better than Hy3 preview for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 for output tokens 2.0x cheaper ($0.30 vs $0.60 per million) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 or Hy3 preview?

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs $0.09 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Hy3 preview costs $0.18 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 or Hy3 preview?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Hy3 preview comparison based on?

31 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Hy3 preview's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next