Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Relace Search

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs 10.0x less per output token than Relace Search ($0.30 vs $3.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
41.5
Output $/M
$0.30
Relace SearchRelace
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$3.00
vs $0.30 vs $3.00 per 1M output tokens. Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 is 10.0x cheaper.

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 or Relace Search: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 for output tokens 10.0x cheaper ($0.30 vs $3.00 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 256K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 has results on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), SciCode and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run); Relace Search has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 not benchmarked, Relace Search not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 $0.30 against Relace Search $3.00 per million output tokens, 10.0x apart.
Context window
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 takes 262K tokens, Relace Search 256K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Relace Search
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Relace SearchLeader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)70.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
SciCode33.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: coding1416Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1417Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Relace Search
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Relace SearchLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.5Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Relace Search
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Relace SearchLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom28.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)41.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Relace Search
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Relace SearchLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)70.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)10.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)55.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1398Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: expert1397Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1406Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Relace Search
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Relace SearchLeader
AA Math Index66.3Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)66.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
OTIS Mock AIME62.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: math1394Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1411Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 8 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Relace Search
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Relace SearchLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)80.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: science1393Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1392Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1387Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1389Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index21 boards measured
General benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Relace Search
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Relace SearchLeader
IFBench50.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)61.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
DTBench67.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMCA22.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text1384Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1363Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1317Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: English1391Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: non-English1372Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1432Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: German1379Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1337Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: Korean1330Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: French1419Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1404Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: Russian1369Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: Polish1353Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1378Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1378Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1336Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1334Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 25 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.0002Fits in one request
Relace Search$0.0025Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.0054Fits in one request
Relace Search$0.059Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.021Fits in one request
Relace Search$0.230Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Relace Search
SpecificationQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Relace Search
MakerQwenRelace
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 29, 2025December 8, 2025
Context window262K256K
Input $/Mtok$0.09$1.00
Output $/Mtok$0.30$3.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 better than Relace Search for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 for output tokens 10.0x cheaper ($0.30 vs $3.00 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 256K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 or Relace Search?

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs $0.09 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Relace Search costs $1.00 and $3.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 or Relace Search?

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507, with 262K tokens against 256K.

Has any benchmark tested both Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Relace Search?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 has results on LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run), SciCode and Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run); Relace Search has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next