Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking leads Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 11.2 to 7.5, and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs 4.0x less per output token ($0.30 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 29 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
41.5
Output $/M
$0.30
26
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.20
3
vs boards won of 29 shared

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 for output tokens 4.0x cheaper ($0.30 vs $1.20 per million) and work measured by AA Intelligence Index or LMArena Text: math, where it leads.

Shared results
29
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 only
16
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking only
1
Like-for-like categories
6 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 not benchmarked, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 4.3 points apart on average over 17 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: French: Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 1419 against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking 1351, 11.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 $0.30 against Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking $1.20 per million output tokens, 4.0x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507BarsQwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingTies
Coding20
Intelligence01
Reasoning30
Math11
Knowledge40
General161
All shared boards263
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index20
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured17.4Only Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)70.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
SciCode33.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)6.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: coding14161392Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: software and IT14171393Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
AA Intelligence Index7.511.2Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom28.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)41.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)70.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)10.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)55.6%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13981371Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: expert13971376Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14061384Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Math benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
AA Math Index66.3Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)66.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
OTIS Mock AIME62.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: math13941399Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
LMArena Text: mathematical work14111390Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index40
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)80.5%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: science13931384Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13921392Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: legal and government13871364Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: business and finance13891360Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index161
General benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
IFBench50.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)61.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
DTBench67.2%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMCA22.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text13841368Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: instruction following13631344Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: creative writing13171314Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: English13911392Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
LMArena Text: non-English13721342Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: Chinese14321407Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: German13791356Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: Japanese13371280Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: Korean13301310Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: French14191351Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: Spanish14041358Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: Russian13691337Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: Polish13531345Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: multi-turn13781346Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: longer queries13781353Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: writing and language13361330Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13341312Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
BenchmarkQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.0002Fits in one request
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking$0.0008Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.0054Fits in one request
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking$0.011Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507$0.021Fits in one request
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking$0.042Fits in one request

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
SpecificationQwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 29, 2025September 11, 2025
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.09$0.15
Output $/Mtok$0.30$1.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 better than Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 for output tokens 4.0x cheaper ($0.30 vs $1.20 per million) and work measured by AA Intelligence Index or LMArena Text: math, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs $0.09 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking costs $0.15 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 or Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking comparison based on?

29 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next