Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 leads Qwen3 Coder Next on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.7 to 9.2, and Qwen3 Coder Next costs 4.4x less per output token ($0.80 vs $3.50 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 4 benchmarks have a result for both.
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Qwen3 Coder Next: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for work measured by AA Coding Index, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 4
- Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 only
- 42
- Qwen3 Coder Next only
- 7
- Like-for-like categories
- 3 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 leads, 12.7 against 9.2.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 leads, 1.3 against 0.9.
Same board, both measured
Web design
Design Arena: websites
No call
Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 has a Design Arena: websites result, 1053.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 Coder Next takes 262K tokens against 128K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 $0.0022, Qwen3 Coder Next $0.0005 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 not benchmarked, Qwen3 Coder Next not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Coding, 10.4 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- AA Coding Index: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 22.1 against Qwen3 Coder Next 36.2, 14.1 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 $3.50 against Qwen3 Coder Next $0.80 per million output tokens, 4.4x apart.
- Context window
- Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 takes 128K tokens, Qwen3 Coder Next 262K.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 | Bars | Qwen3 Coder Next | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 1 | 1 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 1 | 0 | ||
| All shared boards | 3 | 1 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index11
| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 | Qwen3 Coder Next | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Coding Index | 22.1 | 36.2 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
| SciCode | Not measured | 36.2% | Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 18.2% | Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured |
| WeirdML | 41.0% | 34.4% | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1424 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1431 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 | Qwen3 Coder Next | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 12.7 | 9.2 | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 | Qwen3 Coder Next | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 1.3 | 0.9 | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | Not measured | 79.5% | Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured |
| Vending-Bench 2 | -$11 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here | |||
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 | Qwen3 Coder Next | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 73.7% | Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | Not measured | 10.1% | Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | 80.1% | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| Mystery game puzzles | 9.0% | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1416 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1463 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1432 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 | Qwen3 Coder Next | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME | 86.7% | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1412 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1435 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 | Qwen3 Coder Next | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| SimpleQA Verified | 40.4% | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: science | 1433 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1456 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1415 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1413 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here | |||
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 | Qwen3 Coder Next | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design Arena: websites | 1053 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| Design Arena: UI components | 945 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| Design Arena: game dev | 957 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| Design Arena: data viz | 950 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| Design Arena: 3D | 998 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| Design Arena: all code categories | 1033 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here | |||
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 | Qwen3 Coder Next | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | Not measured | 35.2% | Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | Not measured | 47.0% | Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured |
| DTBench | 80.3% | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMCA | 29.3% | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 75.0% | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| Creative writing (Lech Mazur) | 82.4% | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1415 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1386 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1384 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1429 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1397 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1481 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: German | 1408 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1386 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1375 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1389 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1401 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1390 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1406 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1400 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1388 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1370 | Not measured | Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 24 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 | Qwen3 Coder Next | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Qwen3 Coder Next costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Qwen | Qwen |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | July 25, 2025 | February 4, 2026 |
| Context window | 128K | 262K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.45 | $0.12 |
| Output $/Mtok | $3.50 | $0.80 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 better than Qwen3 Coder Next for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for work measured by AA Coding Index, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.45 per million input tokens and $3.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Next costs $0.12 and $0.80. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next, with 262K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks is the Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3 Coder Next comparison based on?
4 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 Coder Next's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.