Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.5-27B

Qwen3.5-27B leads Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 22.9 to 12.7, and Qwen3.5-27B costs 2.2x less per output token ($1.56 vs $3.50 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 32 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
52.9
Output $/M
$3.50
20
Qwen3.5-27BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.56
12
vs boards won of 32 shared

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Qwen3.5-27B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
32
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 only
14
Qwen3.5-27B only
22
Like-for-like categories
7 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 not benchmarked, Qwen3.5-27B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 10.2 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 12.7 against Qwen3.5-27B 22.9, 10.2 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 $3.50 against Qwen3.5-27B $1.56 per million output tokens, 2.2x apart.
Context window
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 takes 128K tokens, Qwen3.5-27B 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507BarsQwen3.5-27BTies
Coding12
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning30
Math11
Knowledge31
General126
All shared boards2012
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index12
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.5-27B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.5-27BLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1359Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
AA Coding Index22.1Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured32.6%Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
WeirdML41.0%39.5%Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
ALE-BenchNot measured349.4Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: coding14241427Qwen3.5-27B
LMArena Text: software and IT14311431Qwen3.5-27B
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1346Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1387Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.5-27B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.5-27BLeader
AA Intelligence Index12.722.9Qwen3.5-27B
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.5-27B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.5-27BLeader
AA Agentic Index1.3Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured93.9%Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
Vending-Bench 2-$11$202Qwen3.5-27B
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index30
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.5-27B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.5-27BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured85.8%Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured23.9%Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)80.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Mystery game puzzles9.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts14161414Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: expert14631428Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English14321428Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1249Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1256Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Math benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.5-27B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.5-27BLeader
OTIS Mock AIME86.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: math14121429Qwen3.5-27B
LMArena Text: mathematical work14351429Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
MathArenaNot measured15.8%Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index31
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.5-27B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.5-27BLeader
SimpleQA Verified40.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: science14331437Qwen3.5-27B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare14561425Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: legal and government14151405Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: business and finance14121399Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.5-27B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.5-27BLeader
Design Arena: websites1052Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: UI components942Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: game dev956Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: data viz950Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: 3D998Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1032Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index126
General benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.5-27B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.5-27BLeader
IFBenchNot measured75.6%Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured77.7%Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
DTBench80.3%82.4%Qwen3.5-27B
LMCA29.3%34.0%Qwen3.5-27B
Fiction.LiveBench75.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)82.4%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text14151409Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: instruction following13861393Qwen3.5-27B
LMArena Text: creative writing13841363Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena VisionNot measured1241Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: English14291425Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: non-English13971390Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: Chinese14811478Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: German14081393Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: Japanese13861346Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: Korean13751359Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1410Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Text: Spanish13891407Qwen3.5-27B
LMArena Text: Russian14001390Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: Polish13901375Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: multi-turn14061410Qwen3.5-27B
LMArena Text: longer queries13991413Qwen3.5-27B
LMArena Text: writing and language13881381Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Text: entertainment and media13701363Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1246Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1301Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1246Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1227Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: captioningNot measured1170Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: recognizing thingsNot measured1210Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1224Only Qwen3.5-27B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.5-27B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.5-27BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.0022Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-27B$0.0010Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.033Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-27B$0.014Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.125Exceeds the context window
Qwen3.5-27B$0.055Fits in one request

Qwen3.5-27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 and Qwen3.5-27B
SpecificationQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen3.5-27B
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 25, 2025February 25, 2026
Context window128K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.45$0.195
Output $/Mtok$3.50$1.56
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 better than Qwen3.5-27B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Qwen3.5-27B?

Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.45 per million input tokens and $3.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5-27B costs $0.195 and $1.56. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 or Qwen3.5-27B?

Qwen3.5-27B, with 262K tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 vs Qwen3.5-27B comparison based on?

32 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5-27B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next