Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B

Qwen3.5-122B-A10B leads Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 17.7 to 12.0, and Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs 2.7x less per output token ($0.775 vs $2.08 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 10 benchmarks have a result for both.

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.775
1
Qwen3.5-122B-A10BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$2.08
9
vs boards won of 10 shared

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 for output tokens 2.7x cheaper ($0.775 vs $2.08 per million) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Shared results
10
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 only
14
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B only
41
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 not benchmarked, Qwen3.5-122B-A10B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 40.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 53.2% against Qwen3.5-122B-A10B 93.6%, 40.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 $0.775 against Qwen3.5-122B-A10B $2.08 per million output tokens, 2.7x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507BarsQwen3.5-122B-A10BTies
Coding11
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning02
General04
All shared boards19
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index11
Coding benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1361Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured43.3Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)78.8%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
SciCode41.4%39.7%Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)15.2%31.1%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
WeirdML38.7%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1436Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1436Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1352Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1352Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 33 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
AA Intelligence Index12.017.7Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
τ²-Bench Telecom53.2%93.6%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL)52.1%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)79.0%85.7%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)15.9%25.2%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
ARC-AGI11.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
ARC-AGI-21.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured17.0%Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1421Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1431Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1431Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision: diagramsNot measured1249Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision: homeworkNot measured1261Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
AA Math Index91.0Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)91.0%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1431Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1431Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)84.3%Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1433Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1423Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1422Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1414Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
Design Arena: websites1058Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: UI components963Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: game dev951Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: data viz1070Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: 3D995Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Design Arena: all code categories1038Not measuredOnly Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
General benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
IFBench51.2%75.7%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)72.0%76.3%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
DTBench78.4%84.3%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMCA23.5%32.2%Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
LMArena TextNot measured1418Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1400Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1368Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena VisionNot measured1244Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1428Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1401Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1463Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1425Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1367Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1353Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1443Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1425Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1400Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1399Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1417Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1411Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1387Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1366Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1249Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1301Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision: reading textNot measured1251Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision: humorNot measured1243Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
LMArena Vision: creative writingNot measured1220Only Qwen3.5-122B-A10B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
BenchmarkQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5-122B-A10BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.0005Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B$0.0013Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.0096Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B$0.019Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507$0.037Fits in one request
Qwen3.5-122B-A10B$0.073Fits in one request

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
SpecificationQwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507Qwen3.5-122B-A10B
MakerQwenQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedJuly 21, 2025February 25, 2026
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.145$0.26
Output $/Mtok$0.775$2.08
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 better than Qwen3.5-122B-A10B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 for output tokens 2.7x cheaper ($0.775 vs $2.08 per million) and work measured by Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) or AA Intelligence Index, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 costs $0.145 per million input tokens and $0.775 per million output tokens; Qwen3.5-122B-A10B costs $0.26 and $2.08. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 or Qwen3.5-122B-A10B?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 vs Qwen3.5-122B-A10B comparison based on?

10 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.5-122B-A10B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next