Ternary Bonsai 2 27B vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs 17.4x less per output token than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed ($0.50 vs $8.70 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $0.50
- Coding
- No data
- Overall
- No data
- Output $/M
- $8.70
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B or MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Ternary Bonsai 2 27B for output tokens 17.4x cheaper ($0.50 vs $8.70 per million).
No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Long documents
Listed context window
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed takes 1.05M tokens against 262K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B $0.0003, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed $0.0087 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Ternary Bonsai 2 27B not benchmarked, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
- Widest single gap
- None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
- Output price
- Ternary Bonsai 2 27B $0.50 against MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed $8.70 per million output tokens, 17.4x apart.
- Context window
- Ternary Bonsai 2 27B takes 262K tokens, MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | PrismML Ternary Bonsai 2 27B | Xiaomi MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | Prism-ml | Xiaomi |
| Weights | Open weights | No public weights listed |
| Released | September 18, 2026 | September 21, 2026 |
| Context window | 262K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.075 | $4.35 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.50 | $8.70 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Ternary Bonsai 2 27B better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Ternary Bonsai 2 27B for output tokens 17.4x cheaper ($0.50 vs $8.70 per million).
Which is cheaper, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B or MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed?
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed costs $4.35 and $8.70. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B or MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
Has any benchmark tested both Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and MiMo-V2.6-Pro-UltraSpeed?
No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 23, 2026.