Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B vs Palmyra X5

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs 12.0x less per output token than Palmyra X5 ($0.50 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Replace Ternary Bonsai 2 27B Replace Palmyra X5
P Ternary Bonsai 2 27BPrism-ml
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.50
W Palmyra X5Writer
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
vs $0.50 vs $6.00 per 1M output tokens. Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is 12.0x cheaper.

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B or Palmyra X5: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Ternary Bonsai 2 27B for output tokens 12.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $6.00 per million).

Model ATernary Bonsai 2 27BPrism-mlNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BPalmyra X5WriterNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B not benchmarked, Palmyra X5 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B $0.50 against Palmyra X5 $6.00 per million output tokens, 12.0x apart.
Context window
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B takes 262K tokens, Palmyra X5 1.04M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B$0.0003Fits in one request
Palmyra X5$0.0036Fits in one request

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B$0.0053Fits in one request
Palmyra X5$0.048Fits in one request

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B$0.020Fits in one request
Palmyra X5$0.180Fits in one request

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and Palmyra X5
SpecificationPrismML Ternary Bonsai 2 27BWriter Palmyra X5
MakerPrism-mlWriter
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedSeptember 18, 2026January 21, 2026
Context window262K1.04M
Input $/Mtok$0.075$0.60
Output $/Mtok$0.50$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Ternary Bonsai 2 27B better than Palmyra X5 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Ternary Bonsai 2 27B for output tokens 12.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $6.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B or Palmyra X5?

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Palmyra X5 costs $0.60 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B or Palmyra X5?

Palmyra X5, with 1.04M tokens against 262K.

Has any benchmark tested both Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and Palmyra X5?

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next