Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B vs UnslopNemo 12B

UnslopNemo 12B costs 1.3x less per output token than Ternary Bonsai 2 27B ($0.40 vs $0.50 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

P Ternary Bonsai 2 27BPrism-ml
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.50
T UnslopNemo 12BTheDrummer
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.40
vs $0.50 vs $0.40 per 1M output tokens. UnslopNemo 12B is 1.3x cheaper.

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B or UnslopNemo 12B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B not benchmarked, UnslopNemo 12B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B $0.50 against UnslopNemo 12B $0.40 per million output tokens, 1.3x apart.
Context window
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B takes 262K tokens, UnslopNemo 12B 1.02M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B$0.0003Fits in one request
UnslopNemo 12B$0.0006Fits in one request

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B$0.0053Fits in one request
UnslopNemo 12B$0.021Fits in one request

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B$0.020Fits in one request
UnslopNemo 12B$0.084Fits in one request

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and UnslopNemo 12B
SpecificationPrismML Ternary Bonsai 2 27BTheDrummer UnslopNemo 12B
MakerPrism-mlTheDrummer
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 18, 2026November 8, 2024
Context window262K1.02M
Input $/Mtok$0.075$0.40
Output $/Mtok$0.50$0.40
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Ternary Bonsai 2 27B better than UnslopNemo 12B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B or UnslopNemo 12B?

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; UnslopNemo 12B costs $0.40 and $0.40. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B or UnslopNemo 12B?

UnslopNemo 12B, with 1.02M tokens against 262K.

Has any benchmark tested both Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and UnslopNemo 12B?

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 23, 2026.

Compare next