Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B vs Hy3

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and Hy3 cost about the same per output token ($0.50 vs $0.528 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Replace Ternary Bonsai 2 27B Replace Hy3
P Ternary Bonsai 2 27BPrism-ml
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.50
Hy3Tencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.528
vs $0.50 vs $0.528 per 1M output tokens. Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is 1.1x cheaper.

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B or Hy3: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Ternary Bonsai 2 27B for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($0.50 vs $0.528 per million).

Model ATernary Bonsai 2 27BPrism-mlNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BHy3TencentNot benchmarked1 independent benchmarkNo cost per solved task

No benchmark has tested both yet. Ternary Bonsai 2 27B has none yet; Hy3 on LMArena WebDev, SciCode and ALE-Bench. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B not benchmarked, Hy3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B $0.50 against Hy3 $0.528 per million output tokens, 1.1x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index7 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and Hy3
BenchmarkTernary Bonsai 2 27BHy3Leader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1506Only Hy3 measured
SciCodeNot measured48.6%Only Hy3 measured
ALE-BenchNot measured838.6Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1466Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1463Only Hy3 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1509Only Hy3 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1486Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and Hy3
BenchmarkTernary Bonsai 2 27BHy3Leader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured89.7%Only Hy3 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured33.5%Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1448Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1461Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1454Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and Hy3
BenchmarkTernary Bonsai 2 27BHy3Leader
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1476Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1483Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and Hy3
BenchmarkTernary Bonsai 2 27BHy3Leader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1457Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1449Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1422Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1424Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index8 boards measured
Web design benchmarks for Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and Hy3
BenchmarkTernary Bonsai 2 27BHy3Leader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1230Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: UI componentsNot measured1204Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1208Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1165Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: 3DNot measured1233Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: all code categoriesNot measured1227Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: SVGNot measured1201Only Hy3 measured
Design Arena: ASCII artNot measured1152Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index18 boards measured
General benchmarks for Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and Hy3
BenchmarkTernary Bonsai 2 27BHy3Leader
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured79.0%Only Hy3 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1438Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1427Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1405Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1447Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1427Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1483Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1444Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1393Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1396Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1450Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1456Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1436Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1446Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1437Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1442Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1415Only Hy3 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1401Only Hy3 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 30 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B$0.0003Fits in one request
Hy3$0.0004Fits in one request

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B$0.0053Fits in one request
Hy3$0.0082Fits in one request

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B$0.020Fits in one request
Hy3$0.032Fits in one request

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and Hy3
SpecificationPrismML Ternary Bonsai 2 27BTencent Hy3
MakerPrism-mlTencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 18, 2026July 6, 2026
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.075$0.132
Output $/Mtok$0.50$0.528
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Ternary Bonsai 2 27B better than Hy3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Ternary Bonsai 2 27B for output tokens 1.1x cheaper ($0.50 vs $0.528 per million).

Which is cheaper, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B or Hy3?

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Hy3 costs $0.132 and $0.528. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B or Hy3?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

Has any benchmark tested both Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and Hy3?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Ternary Bonsai 2 27B has none yet; Hy3 on LMArena WebDev, SciCode and ALE-Bench. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 23, 2026.

Compare next