Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B vs Hy-MT2-30B-A3B

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs 1.7x less per output token than Ternary Bonsai 2 27B ($0.295 vs $0.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Replace Ternary Bonsai 2 27B Replace Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
P Ternary Bonsai 2 27BPrism-ml
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.50
Hy-MT2-30B-A3BTencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.295
vs $0.50 vs $0.295 per 1M output tokens. Hy-MT2-30B-A3B is 1.7x cheaper.

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B or Hy-MT2-30B-A3B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Ternary Bonsai 2 27B for a larger context window (262K against 8K tokens).

Model ATernary Bonsai 2 27BPrism-mlNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BHy-MT2-30B-A3BTencentNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B not benchmarked, Hy-MT2-30B-A3B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B $0.50 against Hy-MT2-30B-A3B $0.295 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
Context window
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B takes 262K tokens, Hy-MT2-30B-A3B 8K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B$0.0003Fits in one request
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B$0.0002Fits in one request

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B$0.0053Fits in one request
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B$0.0046Exceeds the context window

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B$0.020Fits in one request
Hy-MT2-30B-A3B$0.018Exceeds the context window

Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
SpecificationPrismML Ternary Bonsai 2 27BTencent Hy-MT2-30B-A3B
MakerPrism-mlTencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 18, 2026August 20, 2026
Context window262K8K
Input $/Mtok$0.075$0.074
Output $/Mtok$0.50$0.295
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Ternary Bonsai 2 27B better than Hy-MT2-30B-A3B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Ternary Bonsai 2 27B for a larger context window (262K against 8K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B or Hy-MT2-30B-A3B?

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Hy-MT2-30B-A3B costs $0.074 and $0.295. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B or Hy-MT2-30B-A3B?

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B, with 262K tokens against 8K.

Has any benchmark tested both Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and Hy-MT2-30B-A3B?

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 22, 2026.

Compare next