Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B vs Reka Edge

Reka Edge costs 5.0x less per output token than Ternary Bonsai 2 27B ($0.10 vs $0.50 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Replace Ternary Bonsai 2 27B Replace Reka Edge
P Ternary Bonsai 2 27BPrism-ml
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.50
Reka EdgeReka
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.10
vs $0.50 vs $0.10 per 1M output tokens. Reka Edge is 5.0x cheaper.

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B or Reka Edge: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Ternary Bonsai 2 27B for a larger context window (262K against 16K tokens).

Model ATernary Bonsai 2 27BPrism-mlNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BReka EdgeRekaNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B not benchmarked, Reka Edge not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B $0.50 against Reka Edge $0.10 per million output tokens, 5.0x apart.
Context window
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B takes 262K tokens, Reka Edge 16K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B$0.0003Fits in one request
Reka Edge$0.0001Fits in one request

Reka Edge costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B$0.0053Fits in one request
Reka Edge$0.0053Exceeds the context window

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B$0.020Fits in one request
Reka Edge$0.021Exceeds the context window

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and Reka Edge
SpecificationPrismML Ternary Bonsai 2 27BReka Edge
MakerPrism-mlReka
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 18, 2026March 20, 2026
Context window262K16K
Input $/Mtok$0.075$0.10
Output $/Mtok$0.50$0.10
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Ternary Bonsai 2 27B better than Reka Edge for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Ternary Bonsai 2 27B for a larger context window (262K against 16K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B or Reka Edge?

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Reka Edge costs $0.10 and $0.10. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B or Reka Edge?

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B, with 262K tokens against 16K.

Has any benchmark tested both Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and Reka Edge?

No benchmark has tested either model yet, so price and context are the only way to compare them. Data as of October 23, 2026.

Compare next