Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs 12.0x less per output token than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B ($0.50 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Replace Ternary Bonsai 2 27B Replace Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
P Ternary Bonsai 2 27BPrism-ml
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.50
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
vs $0.50 vs $6.00 per 1M output tokens. Ternary Bonsai 2 27B is 12.0x cheaper.

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Ternary Bonsai 2 27B for output tokens 12.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $6.00 per million).

Model ATernary Bonsai 2 27BPrism-mlNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved taskModel BQwen3.8 2.4T A95BQwenNot benchmarkedNo coding benchmarkNo cost per solved task

No benchmark has tested both yet. Ternary Bonsai 2 27B has none yet; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on AA Coding Index, SciCode and AA Intelligence Index. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B not benchmarked, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B $0.50 against Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B $6.00 per million output tokens, 12.0x apart.
Context window
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B takes 262K tokens, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index2 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
BenchmarkTernary Bonsai 2 27BQwen3.8 2.4T A95BLeader
AA Coding IndexNot measured71.9Only Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
SciCodeNot measured54.1%Only Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 41 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
BenchmarkTernary Bonsai 2 27BQwen3.8 2.4T A95BLeader
AA Intelligence IndexNot measured39.9Only Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
BenchmarkTernary Bonsai 2 27BQwen3.8 2.4T A95BLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured50.1Only Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
MCP AtlasNot measured84.5%Only Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
BenchmarkTernary Bonsai 2 27BQwen3.8 2.4T A95BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured93.5%Only Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured42.4%Only Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Math benchmarks for Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
BenchmarkTernary Bonsai 2 27BQwen3.8 2.4T A95BLeader
MathArenaNot measured31.6%Only Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
General benchmarks for Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
BenchmarkTernary Bonsai 2 27BQwen3.8 2.4T A95BLeader
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)Not measured80.3%Only Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 47 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B$0.0003Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B$0.0050Fits in one request

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B$0.0053Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B$0.118Fits in one request

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B$0.020Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B$0.460Fits in one request

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
SpecificationPrismML Ternary Bonsai 2 27BQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
MakerPrism-mlQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedSeptember 18, 2026August 12, 2026
Context window262K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.075$2.00
Output $/Mtok$0.50$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Ternary Bonsai 2 27B better than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Ternary Bonsai 2 27B for output tokens 12.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $6.00 per million).

Which is cheaper, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

Has any benchmark tested both Ternary Bonsai 2 27B and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Ternary Bonsai 2 27B has none yet; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B on AA Coding Index, SciCode and AA Intelligence Index. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 23, 2026.

Compare next