Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3 Coder Flash

Updated October 21, 2026. 0 benchmarks have a result for both. Coding is ranked on the Vibe Coding Index; every other board is shown as published.

P Laguna XS 2.1Poolside
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.12
Qwen3 Coder FlashQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.975
vs $0.12 vs $0.975 per 1M output tokens. Laguna XS 2.1 is 8.1x cheaper.

Decision reading

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Laguna XS 2.1 has the edge where output tokens cost 8.1x less.

Shared results
0
Laguna XS 2.1 only
0
Qwen3 Coder Flash only
0
Like-for-like categories
0 of 9

Shared results can support a head-to-head reading. Results only one model has describe coverage, not superiority.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Laguna XS 2.1 not benchmarked, Qwen3 Coder Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
No category has a result for both models.
Widest single gap
No benchmark has a result for both models.
Output price
Laguna XS 2.1 $0.12 against Qwen3 Coder Flash $0.975 per million output tokens, 8.1x apart.
Context window
Laguna XS 2.1 takes 262K tokens, Qwen3 Coder Flash 1M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

CodingNot comparableSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index0 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Laguna XS 2.1 and Qwen3 Coder Flash
BenchmarkLaguna XS 2.1Qwen3 Coder FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 38 boards here
IntelligenceNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Laguna XS 2.1 and Qwen3 Coder Flash
BenchmarkLaguna XS 2.1Qwen3 Coder FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 2 boards here
Agentic workNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Laguna XS 2.1 and Qwen3 Coder Flash
BenchmarkLaguna XS 2.1Qwen3 Coder FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 39 boards here
ReasoningNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Laguna XS 2.1 and Qwen3 Coder Flash
BenchmarkLaguna XS 2.1Qwen3 Coder FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 21 boards here
MathNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Laguna XS 2.1 and Qwen3 Coder Flash
BenchmarkLaguna XS 2.1Qwen3 Coder FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 13 boards here
KnowledgeNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Laguna XS 2.1 and Qwen3 Coder Flash
BenchmarkLaguna XS 2.1Qwen3 Coder FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 17 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Laguna XS 2.1 and Qwen3 Coder Flash
BenchmarkLaguna XS 2.1Qwen3 Coder FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Laguna XS 2.1 and Qwen3 Coder Flash
BenchmarkLaguna XS 2.1Qwen3 Coder FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 46 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Laguna XS 2.1 and Qwen3 Coder Flash
BenchmarkLaguna XS 2.1Qwen3 Coder FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Laguna XS 2.1$0.0001Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder Flash$0.0007Fits in one request

Laguna XS 2.1 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Laguna XS 2.1$0.0034Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder Flash$0.013Fits in one request

Laguna XS 2.1 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Laguna XS 2.1$0.013Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder Flash$0.049Fits in one request

Laguna XS 2.1 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Laguna XS 2.1 and Qwen3 Coder Flash
SpecificationPoolside Laguna XS 2.1Qwen3 Coder Flash
MakerPoolsideQwen
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedJuly 2, 2026September 17, 2025
Context window262K1M
Input $/Mtok$0.06$0.195
Output $/Mtok$0.12$0.975
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Laguna XS 2.1 better than Qwen3 Coder Flash for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Laguna XS 2.1 has the edge where output tokens cost 8.1x less.

Which is cheaper, Laguna XS 2.1 or Qwen3 Coder Flash?

Laguna XS 2.1 costs $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.12 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Flash costs $0.195 and $0.975. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Laguna XS 2.1 or Qwen3 Coder Flash?

Qwen3 Coder Flash, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Laguna XS 2.1 vs Qwen3 Coder Flash comparison based on?

0 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. Laguna XS 2.1's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 Coder Flash's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next