Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Sonar Reasoning Pro vs Hy-MT2-1.8B

Hy-MT2-1.8B costs 45.2x less per output token than Sonar Reasoning Pro ($0.177 vs $8.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Sonar Reasoning ProPerplexity
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$8.00
Hy-MT2-1.8BTencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.177
vs $8.00 vs $0.177 per 1M output tokens. Hy-MT2-1.8B is 45.2x cheaper.

Sonar Reasoning Pro or Hy-MT2-1.8B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Sonar Reasoning Pro for a larger context window (128K against 8K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Sonar Reasoning Pro has results on AA Intelligence Index; Hy-MT2-1.8B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Sonar Reasoning Pro not benchmarked, Hy-MT2-1.8B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Sonar Reasoning Pro $8.00 against Hy-MT2-1.8B $0.177 per million output tokens, 45.2x apart.
Context window
Sonar Reasoning Pro takes 128K tokens, Hy-MT2-1.8B 8K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Sonar Reasoning Pro and Hy-MT2-1.8B
BenchmarkSonar Reasoning ProHy-MT2-1.8BLeader
AA Intelligence Index11.8Not measuredOnly Sonar Reasoning Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Sonar Reasoning Pro$0.0060Fits in one request
Hy-MT2-1.8B$0.0001Fits in one request

Hy-MT2-1.8B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Sonar Reasoning Pro$0.124Fits in one request
Hy-MT2-1.8B$0.0027Exceeds the context window

Hy-MT2-1.8B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Sonar Reasoning Pro$0.480Exceeds the context window
Hy-MT2-1.8B$0.011Exceeds the context window

Hy-MT2-1.8B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Sonar Reasoning Pro and Hy-MT2-1.8B
SpecificationPerplexity Sonar Reasoning ProTencent Hy-MT2-1.8B
MakerPerplexityTencent
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedMarch 7, 2025August 20, 2026
Context window128K8K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.044
Output $/Mtok$8.00$0.177
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Sonar Reasoning Pro better than Hy-MT2-1.8B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Sonar Reasoning Pro for a larger context window (128K against 8K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Sonar Reasoning Pro or Hy-MT2-1.8B?

Sonar Reasoning Pro costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $8.00 per million output tokens; Hy-MT2-1.8B costs $0.044 and $0.177. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Sonar Reasoning Pro or Hy-MT2-1.8B?

Sonar Reasoning Pro, with 128K tokens against 8K.

Has any benchmark tested both Sonar Reasoning Pro and Hy-MT2-1.8B?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Sonar Reasoning Pro has results on AA Intelligence Index; Hy-MT2-1.8B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next