Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Sonar Reasoning Pro vs Relace Apply 3

Relace Apply 3 costs 6.4x less per output token than Sonar Reasoning Pro ($1.25 vs $8.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Sonar Reasoning ProPerplexity
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$8.00
Relace Apply 3Relace
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.25
vs $8.00 vs $1.25 per 1M output tokens. Relace Apply 3 is 6.4x cheaper.

Sonar Reasoning Pro or Relace Apply 3: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. Sonar Reasoning Pro has results on AA Intelligence Index; Relace Apply 3 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Sonar Reasoning Pro not benchmarked, Relace Apply 3 not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Sonar Reasoning Pro $8.00 against Relace Apply 3 $1.25 per million output tokens, 6.4x apart.
Context window
Sonar Reasoning Pro takes 128K tokens, Relace Apply 3 256K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Sonar Reasoning Pro and Relace Apply 3
BenchmarkSonar Reasoning ProRelace Apply 3Leader
AA Intelligence Index11.8Not measuredOnly Sonar Reasoning Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Sonar Reasoning Pro$0.0060Fits in one request
Relace Apply 3$0.0015Fits in one request

Relace Apply 3 costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Sonar Reasoning Pro$0.124Fits in one request
Relace Apply 3$0.046Fits in one request

Relace Apply 3 costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Sonar Reasoning Pro$0.480Exceeds the context window
Relace Apply 3$0.182Fits in one request

Relace Apply 3 costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Sonar Reasoning Pro and Relace Apply 3
SpecificationPerplexity Sonar Reasoning ProRelace Apply 3
MakerPerplexityRelace
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 7, 2025September 26, 2025
Context window128K256K
Input $/Mtok$2.00$0.85
Output $/Mtok$8.00$1.25
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Sonar Reasoning Pro better than Relace Apply 3 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, Sonar Reasoning Pro or Relace Apply 3?

Sonar Reasoning Pro costs $2.00 per million input tokens and $8.00 per million output tokens; Relace Apply 3 costs $0.85 and $1.25. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Sonar Reasoning Pro or Relace Apply 3?

Relace Apply 3, with 256K tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both Sonar Reasoning Pro and Relace Apply 3?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Sonar Reasoning Pro has results on AA Intelligence Index; Relace Apply 3 has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next