Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

o3 Mini High vs Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct costs 4.4x less per output token than o3 Mini High ($1.00 vs $4.40 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

o3 Mini HighOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$4.40
Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.00
vs $4.40 vs $1.00 per 1M output tokens. Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct is 4.4x cheaper.

o3 Mini High or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick o3 Mini High for a larger context window (200K against 128K tokens).

No benchmark has tested both yet. o3 Mini High has results on AA Coding Index, AA Intelligence Index and AA Agentic Index; Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct on OSWorld, Kagi LLM Benchmark and GeoBench. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
o3 Mini High not benchmarked, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
o3 Mini High $4.40 against Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct $1.00 per million output tokens, 4.4x apart.
Context window
o3 Mini High takes 200K tokens, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index1 board measured
Coding benchmarks for o3 Mini High and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Benchmarko3 Mini HighQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
AA Coding Index16.3Not measuredOnly o3 Mini High measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for o3 Mini High and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Benchmarko3 Mini HighQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
AA Intelligence Index11.0Not measuredOnly o3 Mini High measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for o3 Mini High and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Benchmarko3 Mini HighQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
AA Agentic Index0.9Not measuredOnly o3 Mini High measured
OSWorldNot measured5.0%Only Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Reasoning benchmarks for o3 Mini High and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Benchmarko3 Mini HighQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
Kagi LLM BenchmarkNot measured36.0%Only Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Knowledge benchmarks for o3 Mini High and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Benchmarko3 Mini HighQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
GeoBenchNot measured62.0%Only Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards measured
General benchmarks for o3 Mini High and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Benchmarko3 Mini HighQwen2.5 VL 72B InstructLeader
LMArena VisionNot measured1107Only Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: EnglishNot measured1115Only Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct measured
LMArena Vision: ChineseNot measured1107Only Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct measured
Neither model has a result on the other 43 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

o3 Mini High$0.0033Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct$0.0013Fits in one request

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

o3 Mini High$0.068Fits in one request
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct$0.043Fits in one request

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

o3 Mini High$0.264Exceeds the context window
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct$0.170Exceeds the context window

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of o3 Mini High and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
SpecificationOpenAI o3 Mini HighQwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct
MakerOpenAIQwen
WeightsNo public weights listedOpen weights
ReleasedFebruary 12, 2025February 1, 2025
Context window200K128K
Input $/Mtok$1.10$0.80
Output $/Mtok$4.40$1.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is o3 Mini High better than Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick o3 Mini High for a larger context window (200K against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, o3 Mini High or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

o3 Mini High costs $1.10 per million input tokens and $4.40 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct costs $0.80 and $1.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, o3 Mini High or Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

o3 Mini High, with 200K tokens against 128K.

Has any benchmark tested both o3 Mini High and Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct?

No benchmark has tested both yet. o3 Mini High has results on AA Coding Index, AA Intelligence Index and AA Agentic Index; Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct on OSWorld, Kagi LLM Benchmark and GeoBench. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next