Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

o1-pro vs Relace Search

Relace Search costs 200.0x less per output token than o1-pro ($3.00 vs $600.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

o1-proOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$600.00
Relace SearchRelace
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$3.00
vs $600.00 vs $3.00 per 1M output tokens. Relace Search is 200.0x cheaper.

o1-pro or Relace Search: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

No benchmark has tested both yet. o1-pro has results on AA Intelligence Index and ARC-AGI; Relace Search has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
o1-pro not benchmarked, Relace Search not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
o1-pro $600.00 against Relace Search $3.00 per million output tokens, 200.0x apart.
Context window
o1-pro takes 200K tokens, Relace Search 256K.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for o1-pro and Relace Search
Benchmarko1-proRelace SearchLeader
AA Intelligence Index12.4Not measuredOnly o1-pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Reasoning benchmarks for o1-pro and Relace Search
Benchmarko1-proRelace SearchLeader
ARC-AGI23.3%Not measuredOnly o1-pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 21 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

o1-pro$0.450Fits in one request
Relace Search$0.0025Fits in one request

Relace Search costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

o1-pro$9.30Fits in one request
Relace Search$0.059Fits in one request

Relace Search costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

o1-pro$36.00Exceeds the context window
Relace Search$0.230Fits in one request

Relace Search costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of o1-pro and Relace Search
SpecificationOpenAI o1-proRelace Search
MakerOpenAIRelace
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 19, 2025December 8, 2025
Context window200K256K
Input $/Mtok$150.00$1.00
Output $/Mtok$600.00$3.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is o1-pro better than Relace Search for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, o1-pro or Relace Search?

o1-pro costs $150.00 per million input tokens and $600.00 per million output tokens; Relace Search costs $1.00 and $3.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, o1-pro or Relace Search?

Relace Search, with 256K tokens against 200K.

Has any benchmark tested both o1-pro and Relace Search?

No benchmark has tested both yet. o1-pro has results on AA Intelligence Index and ARC-AGI; Relace Search has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 21, 2026.

Compare next