Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

o1-pro vs Sonar Pro

o1-pro leads Sonar Pro on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.4 to 7.6, and Sonar Pro costs 40.0x less per output token ($15.00 vs $600.00 per million). Updated October 21, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

o1-proOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$600.00
1
Sonar ProPerplexity
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$15.00
0
vs boards won of 1 shared

o1-pro or Sonar Pro: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Shared results
1
o1-pro only
1
Sonar Pro only
4
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
o1-pro not benchmarked, Sonar Pro not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 4.8 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: o1-pro 12.4 against Sonar Pro 7.6, 4.8 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
o1-pro $600.00 against Sonar Pro $15.00 per million output tokens, 40.0x apart.
Context window
Both take 200K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
Categoryo1-proBarsSonar ProTies
Intelligence10
All shared boards10
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index1 board, none shared
Coding benchmarks for o1-pro and Sonar Pro
Benchmarko1-proSonar ProLeader
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured27.5%Only Sonar Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for o1-pro and Sonar Pro
Benchmarko1-proSonar ProLeader
AA Intelligence Index12.47.6o1-pro
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for o1-pro and Sonar Pro
Benchmarko1-proSonar ProLeader
Neither model has a result on 41 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for o1-pro and Sonar Pro
Benchmarko1-proSonar ProLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured57.8%Only Sonar Pro measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured6.6%Only Sonar Pro measured
ARC-AGI23.3%Not measuredOnly o1-pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 19 boards here
MathNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for o1-pro and Sonar Pro
Benchmarko1-proSonar ProLeader
Neither model has a result on 13 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for o1-pro and Sonar Pro
Benchmarko1-proSonar ProLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured75.5%Only Sonar Pro measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for o1-pro and Sonar Pro
Benchmarko1-proSonar ProLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for o1-pro and Sonar Pro
Benchmarko1-proSonar ProLeader
Neither model has a result on 46 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for o1-pro and Sonar Pro
Benchmarko1-proSonar ProLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

o1-pro$0.450Fits in one request
Sonar Pro$0.011Fits in one request

Sonar Pro costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

o1-pro$9.30Fits in one request
Sonar Pro$0.195Fits in one request

Sonar Pro costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

o1-pro$36.00Exceeds the context window
Sonar Pro$0.750Exceeds the context window

Sonar Pro costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of o1-pro and Sonar Pro
SpecificationOpenAI o1-proPerplexity Sonar Pro
MakerOpenAIPerplexity
WeightsNo public weights listedNo public weights listed
ReleasedMarch 19, 2025March 7, 2025
Context window200K200K
Input $/Mtok$150.00$3.00
Output $/Mtok$600.00$15.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is o1-pro better than Sonar Pro for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Compare them on price, context and the boards below.

Which is cheaper, o1-pro or Sonar Pro?

o1-pro costs $150.00 per million input tokens and $600.00 per million output tokens; Sonar Pro costs $3.00 and $15.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, o1-pro or Sonar Pro?

Neither: both take 200K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the o1-pro vs Sonar Pro comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 21, 2026. o1-pro's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Sonar Pro's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next