Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B leads Nemotron 3 Super on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 39.9 to 12.8, and Nemotron 3 Super costs 13.3x less per output token ($0.45 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 8 benchmarks have a result for both.
Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Nemotron 3 Super for output tokens 13.3x cheaper ($0.45 vs $6.00 per million) and work measured by AA Coding Index or SciCode, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 8
- Nemotron 3 Super only
- 31
- Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B only
- 1
- Like-for-like categories
- 6 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B leads, 39.9 against 12.8.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B leads, 50.1 against 1.7.
Same board, both measured
Long documents
Listed context window
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B takes 1.05M tokens against 262K.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Nemotron 3 Super
Nemotron 3 Super $0.0003, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B $0.0050 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Nemotron 3 Super not benchmarked, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Agentic work, 48.4 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
- Widest single gap
- AA Agentic Index: Nemotron 3 Super 1.7 against Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B 50.1, 48.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Nemotron 3 Super $0.45 against Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B $6.00 per million output tokens, 13.3x apart.
- Context window
- Nemotron 3 Super takes 262K tokens, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B 1.05M.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Nemotron 3 Super | Bars | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 0 | 2 | ||
| Intelligence | 0 | 1 | ||
| Agentic work | 0 | 1 | ||
| Reasoning | 0 | 2 | ||
| Math | 0 | 1 | ||
| General | 0 | 1 | ||
| All shared boards | 0 | 8 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Coding Index | 37.7 | 71.9 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
| SciCode | 36.2% | 54.1% | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 28.8% | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| WeirdML | 38.0% | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| ALE-Bench | 213.9 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1404 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1409 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 36 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 12.8 | 39.9 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 1.7 | 50.1 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 67.8% | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| MCP Atlas | Not measured | 84.5% | Only Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 80.0% | 93.5% | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 20.8% | 42.4% | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1386 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1398 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1397 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text: math | 1380 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1405 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| MathArena | 16.6% | 31.6% | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
| Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here | |||
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text: science | 1388 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1383 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1392 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1364 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here | |||
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 9 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 71.5% | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 65.7% | 80.3% | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
| LMArena Text | 1378 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1347 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1317 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| LMArena Text: English | 1400 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1356 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1432 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| LMArena Text: German | 1341 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| LMArena Text: French | 1403 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1418 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1336 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1346 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1369 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1362 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1331 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1336 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Super measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 31 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Nemotron 3 Super costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Nemotron 3 Super costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Nemotron 3 Super costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Super | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | NVIDIA | Qwen |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | March 11, 2026 | August 12, 2026 |
| Context window | 262K | 1.05M |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.085 | $2.00 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.45 | $6.00 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Nemotron 3 Super better than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3 Super for output tokens 13.3x cheaper ($0.45 vs $6.00 per million) and work measured by AA Coding Index or SciCode, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
Nemotron 3 Super costs $0.085 per million input tokens and $0.45 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3 Super or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks is the Nemotron 3 Super vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B comparison based on?
8 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Nemotron 3 Super's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.