Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs 5.5x less per output token than Beam 1.0 501B A23B ($0.22 vs $1.20 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 23 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.22
0
R Beam 1.0 501B A23BReflection
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$1.20
23
vs boards won of 23 shared

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Beam 1.0 501B A23B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for output tokens 5.5x cheaper ($0.22 vs $1.20 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Shared results
23
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B only
19
Beam 1.0 501B A23B only
5
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B not benchmarked, Beam 1.0 501B A23B not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 15.8 points apart on average over 12 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
LMArena Text: longer queries: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 1300 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1429, 21.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B $0.22 against Beam 1.0 501B A23B $1.20 per million output tokens, 5.5x apart.
Context window
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B takes 262K tokens, Beam 1.0 501B A23B 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BBarsBeam 1.0 501B A23BTies
Coding02
Reasoning03
Math02
Knowledge04
General012
All shared boards023
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
LMArena WebDevNot measured1437Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
AA Coding Index14.4Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)74.1%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
SciCode30.6%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)13.6%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: coding13781473Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: software and IT13831461Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1443Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1436Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board, none shared
Intelligence benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AA Intelligence Index8.9Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AA Agentic Index1.0Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
τ²-Bench Telecom40.9%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index03
Reasoning benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)75.7%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)11.4%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts13481442Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: expert13551447Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English13761451Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Math benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
AA Math Index91.0Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)91.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: math13711459Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: mathematical work13751475Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index04
Knowledge benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)79.4%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: science13531430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare13491376Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: legal and government13411433Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: business and finance13461430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Design Arena: websitesNot measured1245Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Design Arena: game devNot measured1220Only Beam 1.0 501B A23B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 7 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index012
General benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
IFBench71.1%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)38.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text13481425Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: instruction following13031430Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: creative writing12691390Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: English13771436Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: non-English13201413Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: Chinese13831424Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: German1348Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1268Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Korean1269Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: French13961461Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: Spanish1376Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Russian13041412Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: Polish1303Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn13191414Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: longer queries13001429Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: writing and language12831400Beam 1.0 501B A23B
LMArena Text: entertainment and media12931399Beam 1.0 501B A23B
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BBeam 1.0 501B A23BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.0002Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.0010Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.0034Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.024Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.013Fits in one request
Beam 1.0 501B A23B$0.092Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Beam 1.0 501B A23B
SpecificationNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BReflection Beam 1.0 501B A23B
MakerNVIDIAReflection
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 14, 2025October 16, 2026
Context window262K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.055$0.40
Output $/Mtok$0.22$1.20
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it01
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B better than Beam 1.0 501B A23B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for output tokens 5.5x cheaper ($0.22 vs $1.20 per million) and work measured by LMArena Text: coding or LMArena Text: software and IT, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs $0.055 per million input tokens and $0.22 per million output tokens; Beam 1.0 501B A23B costs $0.40 and $1.20. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Beam 1.0 501B A23B?

Beam 1.0 501B A23B, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Beam 1.0 501B A23B comparison based on?

23 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Beam 1.0 501B A23B's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next