Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3 Coder Next

Qwen3 Coder Next leads Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 9.2 to 8.9, and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs 3.6x less per output token ($0.22 vs $0.80 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 10 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.22
4
Qwen3 Coder NextQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.80
6
vs boards won of 10 shared

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Qwen3 Coder Next: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for output tokens 3.6x cheaper ($0.22 vs $0.80 per million) and work measured by AA Coding Index or SciCode, where it leads.

Shared results
10
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B only
32
Qwen3 Coder Next only
1
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B not benchmarked, Qwen3 Coder Next not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 22.4 points apart on average over 2 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
τ²-Bench Telecom: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 40.9% against Qwen3 Coder Next 79.5%, 38.6 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B $0.22 against Qwen3 Coder Next $0.80 per million output tokens, 3.6x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BBarsQwen3 Coder NextTies
Coding03
Intelligence01
Agentic work11
Reasoning20
General11
All shared boards46
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index03
Coding benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3 Coder NextLeader
AA Coding Index14.436.2Qwen3 Coder Next
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)74.1%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
SciCode30.6%36.2%Qwen3 Coder Next
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)13.6%18.2%Qwen3 Coder Next
WeirdMLNot measured34.4%Only Qwen3 Coder Next measured
LMArena Text: coding1378Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1383Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3 Coder NextLeader
AA Intelligence Index8.99.2Qwen3 Coder Next
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
Agentic work benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3 Coder NextLeader
AA Agentic Index1.00.9Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
τ²-Bench Telecom40.9%79.5%Qwen3 Coder Next
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index20
Reasoning benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3 Coder NextLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)75.7%73.7%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)11.4%10.1%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
LMArena Text: hard prompts1348Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: expert1355Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1376Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3 Coder NextLeader
AA Math Index91.0Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)91.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: math1371Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1375Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3 Coder NextLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)79.4%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: science1353Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1349Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1341Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1346Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 13 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3 Coder NextLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index11
General benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3 Coder NextLeader
IFBench71.1%35.2%Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)38.0%47.0%Qwen3 Coder Next
LMArena Text1348Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1303Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1269Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: English1377Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: non-English1320Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1383Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: German1348Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1268Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Korean1269Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: French1396Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1376Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Russian1304Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Polish1303Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1319Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1300Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1283Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1293Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Qwen3 Coder Next
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3 Coder NextLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.0002Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder Next$0.0005Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.0034Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder Next$0.0084Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.013Fits in one request
Qwen3 Coder Next$0.032Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Qwen3 Coder Next
SpecificationNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3 Coder Next
MakerNVIDIAQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 14, 2025February 4, 2026
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.055$0.12
Output $/Mtok$0.22$0.80
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B better than Qwen3 Coder Next for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for output tokens 3.6x cheaper ($0.22 vs $0.80 per million) and work measured by AA Coding Index or SciCode, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs $0.055 per million input tokens and $0.22 per million output tokens; Qwen3 Coder Next costs $0.12 and $0.80. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Qwen3 Coder Next?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

How many benchmarks is the Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3 Coder Next comparison based on?

10 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 Coder Next's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next