Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B leads Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 39.9 to 8.9, and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs 27.3x less per output token ($0.22 vs $6.00 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; 7 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.22
0
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95BQwen
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$6.00
7
vs boards won of 7 shared

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for output tokens 27.3x cheaper ($0.22 vs $6.00 per million) and work measured by AA Coding Index or SciCode, where it leads.

Shared results
7
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B only
35
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B only
2
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B not benchmarked, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B not benchmarked.
Widest category
Agentic work, 49.1 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Coding Index: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 14.4 against Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B 71.9, 57.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B $0.22 against Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B $6.00 per million output tokens, 27.3x apart.
Context window
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B takes 262K tokens, Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B 1.05M.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BBarsQwen3.8 2.4T A95BTies
Coding02
Intelligence01
Agentic work01
Reasoning02
General01
All shared boards07
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index02
Coding benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3.8 2.4T A95BLeader
AA Coding Index14.471.9Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)74.1%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
SciCode30.6%54.1%Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)13.6%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: coding1378Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1382Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3.8 2.4T A95BLeader
AA Intelligence Index8.939.9Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Agentic work benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3.8 2.4T A95BLeader
AA Agentic Index1.050.1Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
τ²-Bench Telecom40.9%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
MCP AtlasNot measured84.5%Only Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index02
Reasoning benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3.8 2.4T A95BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)75.7%93.5%Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)11.4%42.4%Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
LMArena Text: hard prompts1348Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: expert1356Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1376Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3.8 2.4T A95BLeader
AA Math Index91.0Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)91.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: math1371Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1375Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
MathArenaNot measured31.6%Only Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3.8 2.4T A95BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)79.4%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: science1353Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1349Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1341Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1345Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3.8 2.4T A95BLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3.8 2.4T A95BLeader
IFBench71.1%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)38.0%80.3%Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
LMArena Text1348Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1304Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1270Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: English1378Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: non-English1320Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1383Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: German1348Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1269Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Korean1269Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: French1396Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1376Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Russian1304Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Polish1302Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1319Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1300Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1284Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1294Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3.8 2.4T A95BLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.0002Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B$0.0050Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.0034Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B$0.118Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.013Fits in one request
Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B$0.460Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B
SpecificationNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BQwen3.8 2.4T A95B
MakerNVIDIAQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 14, 2025August 12, 2026
Context window262K1.05M
Input $/Mtok$0.055$2.00
Output $/Mtok$0.22$6.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B better than Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for output tokens 27.3x cheaper ($0.22 vs $6.00 per million) and work measured by AA Coding Index or SciCode, where it leads.

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs $0.055 per million input tokens and $0.22 per million output tokens; Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B costs $2.00 and $6.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B?

Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B comparison based on?

7 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 23, 2026. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next