Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 8.9 to 7.5, and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs 1.4x less per output token ($0.22 vs $0.30 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 40 benchmarks have a result for both.
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507: which to pick
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.
Pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for output tokens 1.4x cheaper ($0.22 vs $0.30 per million) and work measured by SciCode or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.
- Shared results
- 40
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B only
- 2
- Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 only
- 5
- Like-for-like categories
- 7 of 9
Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.
Which one for your work
Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.
Coding
Vibe Coding Index, six public coding benchmarks
No call
Neither has a coding score yet.
One side not measured
Intelligence
AA Intelligence Index
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B leads, 8.9 against 7.5.
Same board, both measured
Agentic work
AA Agentic Index
No call
Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has a AA Agentic Index result, 1.0.
Directional only
Long documents
Listed context window
No call
Both take 262K tokens.
Listed by OpenRouter
Everyday cost
1K input + 500 output tokens
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B $0.0002, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 $0.0002 per turn.
List prices
At a glance
- Coding index
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B not benchmarked, Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 not benchmarked.
- Widest category
- Math, 14.9 points apart on average over 4 shared benchmarks.
- Widest single gap
- AA Math Index: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 91.0 against Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 66.3, 24.7 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
- Output price
- Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B $0.22 against Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 $0.30 per million output tokens, 1.4x apart.
- Context window
- Both take 262K tokens.
Benchmark by benchmark
First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.
| Category | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Bars | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | Ties |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coding | 2 | 3 | ||
| Intelligence | 1 | 0 | ||
| Agentic work | 1 | 0 | ||
| Reasoning | 2 | 3 | ||
| Math | 2 | 2 | ||
| Knowledge | 0 | 5 | ||
| General | 1 | 18 | ||
| All shared boards | 9 | 31 |
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index23
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Coding Index | 14.4 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured |
| LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) | 74.1% | 70.7% | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
| SciCode | 30.6% | 33.0% | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run) | 13.6% | 6.1% | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
| LMArena Text: coding | 1378 | 1416 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: software and IT | 1383 | 1417 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here | |||
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Intelligence Index | 8.9 | 7.5 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
| Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here | |||
Agentic workLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Agentic Index | 1.0 | Not measured | Only Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured |
| τ²-Bench Telecom | 40.9% | 28.1% | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard (BFCL) | Not measured | 41.4% | Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured |
| Neither model has a result on the other 39 boards here | |||
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index23
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run) | 75.7% | 70.7% | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
| Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run) | 11.4% | 10.3% | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
| GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run) | Not measured | 55.6% | Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts | 1348 | 1398 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: expert | 1355 | 1397 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: hard prompts in English | 1376 | 1406 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here | |||
MathLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| AA Math Index | 91.0 | 66.3 | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
| AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run) | 91.0% | 66.3% | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
| OTIS Mock AIME | Not measured | 62.2% | Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text: math | 1371 | 1394 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: mathematical work | 1375 | 1411 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 9 boards here | |||
KnowledgeLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index05
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run) | 79.4% | 80.5% | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: science | 1353 | 1393 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare | 1349 | 1392 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: legal and government | 1341 | 1387 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: business and finance | 1346 | 1389 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here | |||
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 9 boards here | |||
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index118
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| IFBench | 71.1% | 50.7% | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B |
| Long context reasoning (AA-LCR) | 38.0% | 61.3% | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| DTBench | Not measured | 67.2% | Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured |
| LMCA | Not measured | 22.4% | Only Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 measured |
| LMArena Text | 1348 | 1384 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: instruction following | 1303 | 1363 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: creative writing | 1269 | 1317 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: English | 1377 | 1391 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: non-English | 1320 | 1372 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: Chinese | 1383 | 1432 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: German | 1348 | 1379 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: Japanese | 1268 | 1337 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: Korean | 1269 | 1330 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: French | 1396 | 1419 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: Spanish | 1376 | 1404 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: Russian | 1304 | 1369 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: Polish | 1303 | 1353 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: multi-turn | 1319 | 1378 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: longer queries | 1300 | 1378 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: writing and language | 1283 | 1336 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| LMArena Text: entertainment and media | 1293 | 1334 | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
| Neither model has a result on the other 27 boards here | |||
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
| Benchmark | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 | Leader |
|---|---|---|---|
| Neither model has a result on 5 boards here | |||
What each workload costs
Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.
Chat turn
1K input + 500 output tokens
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less
Repository review
50K input + 3K output tokens
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less
Agent loop
200K input + 10K output tokens
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less
Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.
Specification differences
The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.
| Specification | NVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B | Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 |
|---|---|---|
| Maker | NVIDIA | Qwen |
| Weights | Open weights | Open weights |
| Released | December 14, 2025 | July 29, 2025 |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Input $/Mtok | $0.055 | $0.09 |
| Output $/Mtok | $0.22 | $0.30 |
| Coding index | Not benchmarked | Not benchmarked |
| Independent measurements behind it | 0 | 0 |
| Cost per solved task | Not computable | Not computable |
| Source | OpenRouter listing | OpenRouter listing |
Questions
Is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B better than Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 for coding?
Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for output tokens 1.4x cheaper ($0.22 vs $0.30 per million) and work measured by SciCode or LMArena Text: coding, where it leads.
Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507?
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs $0.055 per million input tokens and $0.22 per million output tokens; Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 costs $0.09 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.
Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507?
Neither: both take 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks is the Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507 comparison based on?
40 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and Qwen3 30B A3B Instruct 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.