Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Ternary Bonsai 2 27B

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs 2.3x less per output token than Ternary Bonsai 2 27B ($0.22 vs $0.50 per million). Updated October 23, 2026; no benchmark has tested both models yet.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.22
P Ternary Bonsai 2 27BPrism-ml
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.50
vs $0.22 vs $0.50 per 1M output tokens. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B is 2.3x cheaper.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Ternary Bonsai 2 27B: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for output tokens 2.3x cheaper ($0.22 vs $0.50 per million).

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has results on AA Coding Index, LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) and SciCode; Ternary Bonsai 2 27B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B not benchmarked, Ternary Bonsai 2 27B not benchmarked.
Widest category
None yet: no category has been tested on both models.
Widest single gap
None yet: no benchmark has tested both models.
Output price
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B $0.22 against Ternary Bonsai 2 27B $0.50 per million output tokens, 2.3x apart.
Context window
Both take 262K tokens.

Benchmark by benchmark

Every board either model has a result on, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale. Only one model is measured on each, so no row names a leader.

CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index6 boards measured
Coding benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BTernary Bonsai 2 27BLeader
AA Coding Index14.4Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)74.1%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
SciCode30.6%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)13.6%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: coding1378Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1382Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index1 board measured
Intelligence benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BTernary Bonsai 2 27BLeader
AA Intelligence Index8.9Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards measured
Agentic work benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BTernary Bonsai 2 27BLeader
AA Agentic Index1.0Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
τ²-Bench Telecom40.9%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Reasoning benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BTernary Bonsai 2 27BLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)75.7%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)11.4%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1348Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: expert1356Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1376Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 18 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards measured
Math benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BTernary Bonsai 2 27BLeader
AA Math Index91.0Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)91.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: math1371Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1375Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards measured
Knowledge benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BTernary Bonsai 2 27BLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)79.4%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: science1353Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1349Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1341Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1345Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards measured
General benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BTernary Bonsai 2 27BLeader
IFBench71.1%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)38.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text1348Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1304Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1270Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: English1378Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: non-English1320Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1383Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: German1348Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1269Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Korean1269Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: French1396Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1376Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Russian1304Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Polish1302Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1319Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1300Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1284Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1294Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.0002Fits in one request
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B$0.0003Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.0034Fits in one request
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B$0.0053Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.013Fits in one request
Ternary Bonsai 2 27B$0.020Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
SpecificationNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BPrismML Ternary Bonsai 2 27B
MakerNVIDIAPrism-ml
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedDecember 14, 2025September 18, 2026
Context window262K262K
Input $/Mtok$0.055$0.075
Output $/Mtok$0.22$0.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B better than Ternary Bonsai 2 27B for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for output tokens 2.3x cheaper ($0.22 vs $0.50 per million).

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Ternary Bonsai 2 27B?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs $0.055 per million input tokens and $0.22 per million output tokens; Ternary Bonsai 2 27B costs $0.075 and $0.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Ternary Bonsai 2 27B?

Neither: both take 262K tokens.

Has any benchmark tested both Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and Ternary Bonsai 2 27B?

No benchmark has tested both yet. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B has results on AA Coding Index, LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run) and SciCode; Ternary Bonsai 2 27B has none yet. Compare them on price and context instead. Data as of October 23, 2026.

Compare next