Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs o1-pro

o1-pro leads Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 12.4 to 8.9, and Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs 2727.3x less per output token ($0.22 vs $600.00 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 1 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.22
0
o1-proOpenAI
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$600.00
1
vs boards won of 1 shared

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or o1-pro: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for output tokens 2727.3x cheaper ($0.22 vs $600.00 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 200K tokens).

Shared results
1
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B only
41
o1-pro only
1
Like-for-like categories
1 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B not benchmarked, o1-pro not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 3.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B 8.9 against o1-pro 12.4, 3.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B $0.22 against o1-pro $600.00 per million output tokens, 2727.3x apart.
Context window
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B takes 262K tokens, o1-pro 200K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BBarso1-proTies
Intelligence01
All shared boards01
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index6 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and o1-pro
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3Bo1-proLeader
AA Coding Index14.4Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LiveCodeBench (Artificial Analysis run)74.1%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
SciCode30.6%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)13.6%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: coding1378Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: software and IT1383Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and o1-pro
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3Bo1-proLeader
AA Intelligence Index8.912.4o1-pro
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and o1-pro
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3Bo1-proLeader
AA Agentic Index1.0Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
τ²-Bench Telecom40.9%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 40 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and o1-pro
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3Bo1-proLeader
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)75.7%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)11.4%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
ARC-AGINot measured23.3%Only o1-pro measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts1348Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: expert1355Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in English1376Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and o1-pro
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3Bo1-proLeader
AA Math Index91.0Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
AIME 2025 (Artificial Analysis run)91.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: math1371Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: mathematical work1375Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 10 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and o1-pro
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3Bo1-proLeader
MMLU Pro (Artificial Analysis run)79.4%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: science1353Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcare1349Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: legal and government1341Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: business and finance1346Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and o1-pro
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3Bo1-proLeader
Neither model has a result on 9 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index19 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and o1-pro
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3Bo1-proLeader
IFBench71.1%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)38.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text1348Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: instruction following1303Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: creative writing1269Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: English1377Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: non-English1320Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Chinese1383Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: German1348Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Japanese1268Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Korean1269Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: French1396Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Spanish1376Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Russian1304Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: Polish1303Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: multi-turn1319Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: longer queries1300Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: writing and language1283Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and media1293Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and o1-pro
BenchmarkNemotron 3 Nano 30B A3Bo1-proLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.0002Fits in one request
o1-pro$0.450Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.0034Fits in one request
o1-pro$9.30Fits in one request

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B$0.013Fits in one request
o1-pro$36.00Exceeds the context window

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and o1-pro
SpecificationNVIDIA Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3BOpenAI o1-pro
MakerNVIDIAOpenAI
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedDecember 14, 2025March 19, 2025
Context window262K200K
Input $/Mtok$0.055$150.00
Output $/Mtok$0.22$600.00
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it00
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B better than o1-pro for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B for output tokens 2727.3x cheaper ($0.22 vs $600.00 per million) and a larger context window (262K against 200K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or o1-pro?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B costs $0.055 per million input tokens and $0.22 per million output tokens; o1-pro costs $150.00 and $600.00. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or o1-pro?

Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, with 262K tokens against 200K.

How many benchmarks is the Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs o1-pro comparison based on?

1 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B's coding index rests on 0 independent benchmarks and o1-pro's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next