Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Solar Pro 4

Solar Pro 4 leads Nemotron 3.5 Super VL on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 28.2 to 26.5, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs 1.2x less per output token ($0.50 vs $0.60 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 9 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
35.6
Output $/M
$0.50
2
Solar Pro 4Upstage
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
7
vs boards won of 9 shared

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Solar Pro 4: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($0.50 vs $0.60 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 524K tokens).

Shared results
9
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL only
7
Solar Pro 4 only
36
Like-for-like categories
5 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL not benchmarked, Solar Pro 4 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 3.6 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: game dev: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 1110 against Solar Pro 4 1169, 7.4 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL $0.50 against Solar Pro 4 $0.60 per million output tokens, 1.2x apart.
Context window
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL takes 1.05M tokens, Solar Pro 4 524K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNemotron 3.5 Super VLBarsSolar Pro 4Ties
Coding01
Intelligence01
Reasoning10
Web design14
General01
All shared boards27
CodingLike-for-likeSix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index01
Coding benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLSolar Pro 4Leader
LiveBench coding65.5%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1371Only Solar Pro 4 measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured52.7Only Solar Pro 4 measured
SciCode47.8%48.0%Solar Pro 4
ALE-BenchNot measured179.3Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1438Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1431Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1363Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1371Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
Intelligence benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLSolar Pro 4Leader
AA Intelligence Index26.528.2Solar Pro 4
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLSolar Pro 4Leader
Design Arena: agents building web appsNot measured1105Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LiveBench research70.9%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench browser4.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench long agentic15.8%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 38 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLSolar Pro 4Leader
LiveBench reasoning78.8%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured89.1%Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)30.7%29.8%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1400Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1428Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1427Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLSolar Pro 4Leader
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1421Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1427Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLSolar Pro 4Leader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1404Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1374Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1383Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1381Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index14
Web design benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLSolar Pro 4Leader
Design Arena: websites11731176Solar Pro 4
Design Arena: UI components11491147Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Design Arena: game dev11101169Solar Pro 4
Design Arena: data vizNot measured1178Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Design Arena: 3D11281178Solar Pro 4
Design Arena: all code categories11541182Solar Pro 4
LiveBench design60.7%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index01
General benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLSolar Pro 4Leader
LiveBench data analysis64.6%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.0%70.7%Solar Pro 4
LMArena TextNot measured1388Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1375Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1317Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1414Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1363Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1422Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1358Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1320Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1383Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1400Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1409Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1357Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1304Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1385Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1382Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1344Only Solar Pro 4 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1332Only Solar Pro 4 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 29 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Solar Pro 4
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLSolar Pro 4Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0004Fits in one request
Solar Pro 4$0.0004Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0090Fits in one request
Solar Pro 4$0.0093Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.035Fits in one request
Solar Pro 4$0.036Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Solar Pro 4
SpecificationNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VLUpstage Solar Pro 4
MakerNVIDIAUpstage
WeightsOpen weightsNo public weights listed
ReleasedOctober 15, 2026August 10, 2026
Context window1.05M524K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.15
Output $/Mtok$0.50$0.60
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nemotron 3.5 Super VL better than Solar Pro 4 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($0.50 vs $0.60 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 524K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Solar Pro 4?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Solar Pro 4 costs $0.15 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Solar Pro 4?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, with 1.05M tokens against 524K.

How many benchmarks is the Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Solar Pro 4 comparison based on?

9 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Solar Pro 4's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next