Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Hy3 preview

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL leads Hy3 preview on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 26.5 to 25.3, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs 1.2x less per output token ($0.50 vs $0.60 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
35.6
Output $/M
$0.50
3
Hy3 previewTencent
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.60
0
vs boards won of 3 shared

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Hy3 preview: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($0.50 vs $0.60 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

Shared results
3
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL only
13
Hy3 preview only
33
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL not benchmarked, Hy3 preview not benchmarked.
Widest category
General, 4.3 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR): Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 69.0% against Hy3 preview 64.7%, 4.3 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL $0.50 against Hy3 preview $0.60 per million output tokens, 1.2x apart.
Context window
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL takes 1.05M tokens, Hy3 preview 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNemotron 3.5 Super VLBarsHy3 previewTies
Intelligence10
Reasoning10
General10
All shared boards30
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index9 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLHy3 previewLeader
LiveBench coding65.5%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LMArena WebDevNot measured1357Only Hy3 preview measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured58.8Only Hy3 preview measured
SciCode47.8%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured34.1%Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1421Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1423Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena WebDev: ReactNot measured1349Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena WebDev: HTMLNot measured1356Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLHy3 previewLeader
AA Intelligence Index26.525.3Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLHy3 previewLeader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured24.1Only Hy3 preview measured
LiveBench research70.9%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench browser4.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench long agentic15.8%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured92.7%Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLHy3 previewLeader
LiveBench reasoning78.8%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured86.7%Only Hy3 preview measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)30.7%27.8%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1413Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1422Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1416Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 17 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLHy3 previewLeader
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1424Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1442Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 12 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLHy3 previewLeader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1416Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1405Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1430Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1397Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLHy3 previewLeader
Design Arena: websites1173Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: UI components1149Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: game dev1110Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: 3D1128Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: all code categories1154Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench design60.7%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLHy3 previewLeader
LiveBench data analysis64.6%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
IFBenchNot measured63.1%Only Hy3 preview measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.0%64.7%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
LMArena TextNot measured1401Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1383Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1339Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1409Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1390Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1435Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1425Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1399Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1399Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1411Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1402Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1370Only Hy3 preview measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1352Only Hy3 preview measured
Neither model has a result on the other 32 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Hy3 preview
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLHy3 previewLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0004Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.0005Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0090Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.011Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.035Fits in one request
Hy3 preview$0.042Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Hy3 preview
SpecificationNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VLTencent Hy3 preview
MakerNVIDIATencent
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 15, 2026April 22, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.18
Output $/Mtok$0.50$0.60
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it11
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nemotron 3.5 Super VL better than Hy3 preview for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for output tokens 1.2x cheaper ($0.50 vs $0.60 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Hy3 preview?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Hy3 preview costs $0.18 and $0.60. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Hy3 preview?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Hy3 preview comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Hy3 preview's on 1. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next