Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Step 3.5 Flash

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL leads Step 3.5 Flash on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 26.5 to 17.0, and Step 3.5 Flash costs 1.7x less per output token ($0.30 vs $0.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 3 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
35.6
Output $/M
$0.50
3
Step 3.5 FlashStepFun
Coding
No data
Overall
No data
Output $/M
$0.30
0
vs boards won of 3 shared

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Step 3.5 Flash: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

Shared results
3
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL only
13
Step 3.5 Flash only
32
Like-for-like categories
3 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL not benchmarked, Step 3.5 Flash not benchmarked.
Widest category
Intelligence, 9.5 points apart on average over 1 shared benchmark.
Widest single gap
AA Intelligence Index: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 26.5 against Step 3.5 Flash 17.0, 9.5 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL $0.50 against Step 3.5 Flash $0.30 per million output tokens, 1.7x apart.
Context window
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL takes 1.05M tokens, Step 3.5 Flash 262K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNemotron 3.5 Super VLBarsStep 3.5 FlashTies
Intelligence10
Reasoning10
General10
All shared boards30
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index5 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLStep 3.5 FlashLeader
LiveBench coding65.5%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
SciCode47.8%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Terminal-Bench Hard (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured32.6%Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1436Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1434Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 34 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLStep 3.5 FlashLeader
AA Intelligence Index26.517.0Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLStep 3.5 FlashLeader
LiveBench research70.9%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench browser4.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench long agentic15.8%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
τ²-Bench TelecomNot measured94.4%Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Reasoning benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLStep 3.5 FlashLeader
LiveBench reasoning78.8%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
GPQA Diamond (Artificial Analysis run)Not measured83.1%Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)30.7%24.5%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1411Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1421Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1421Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index2 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLStep 3.5 FlashLeader
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1408Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1421Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index4 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLStep 3.5 FlashLeader
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1415Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1408Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1408Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1394Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 14 boards here
Web designDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index6 boards, none shared
Web design benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLStep 3.5 FlashLeader
Design Arena: websites1172Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: UI components1153Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: game dev1110Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: 3D1127Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Design Arena: all code categories1155Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench design60.7%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 3 boards here
GeneralLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
General benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLStep 3.5 FlashLeader
LiveBench data analysis64.6%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
IFBenchNot measured66.5%Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.0%63.0%Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
LMArena TextNot measured1403Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1385Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1357Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1417Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1385Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1446Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1405Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1353Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1351Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: FrenchNot measured1421Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1419Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1385Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1389Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1404Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1402Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1372Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1360Only Step 3.5 Flash measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Step 3.5 Flash
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLStep 3.5 FlashLeader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0004Fits in one request
Step 3.5 Flash$0.0003Fits in one request

Step 3.5 Flash costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0090Fits in one request
Step 3.5 Flash$0.0059Fits in one request

Step 3.5 Flash costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.035Fits in one request
Step 3.5 Flash$0.023Fits in one request

Step 3.5 Flash costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Step 3.5 Flash
SpecificationNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VLStepFun Step 3.5 Flash
MakerNVIDIAStepFun
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 15, 2026January 29, 2026
Context window1.05M262K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.10
Output $/Mtok$0.50$0.30
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nemotron 3.5 Super VL better than Step 3.5 Flash for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for a larger context window (1.05M against 262K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Step 3.5 Flash?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Step 3.5 Flash costs $0.10 and $0.30. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Step 3.5 Flash?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks is the Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Step 3.5 Flash comparison based on?

3 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Step 3.5 Flash's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next