Enter opens the highlighted result. Esc closes.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL leads Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, 26.5 to 12.7, and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs 7.0x less per output token ($0.50 vs $3.50 per million). Updated October 22, 2026; 6 benchmarks have a result for both.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VLNVIDIA
Coding
No data
Overall
35.6
Output $/M
$0.50
6
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Qwen
Coding
No data
Overall
52.9
Output $/M
$3.50
0
vs boards won of 6 shared

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507: which to pick

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding.

Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for output tokens 7.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $3.50 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 128K tokens).

Shared results
6
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL only
10
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 only
40
Like-for-like categories
2 of 9

Only benchmarks that tested both models count toward a pick; a result only one model has is shown but not compared.

Which one for your work

Each card is decided by one number both models carry. Where only one has it, the card says so and makes no call.

At a glance

Coding index
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL not benchmarked, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 not benchmarked.
Widest category
Web design, 18.4 points apart on average over 5 shared benchmarks.
Widest single gap
Design Arena: UI components: Nemotron 3.5 Super VL 1149 against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 942, 25.9 points apart on a 0 to 100 scale.
Output price
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL $0.50 against Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 $3.50 per million output tokens, 7.0x apart.
Context window
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL takes 1.05M tokens, Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 128K.

Benchmark by benchmark

First the score: boards each model leads, per category, where both have a result. Then every board, a category to a fold; bars are each result on a 0 to 100 scale, so compare the two in a row, not one row with another.

Boards won, where both have a result
CategoryNemotron 3.5 Super VLBarsQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Ties
Intelligence10
Web design50
All shared boards60
CodingDirectional onlySix of these boards feed the Vibe Coding Index6 boards, none shared
Coding benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
LiveBench coding65.5%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
AA Coding IndexNot measured22.1Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
SciCode47.8%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
WeirdMLNot measured41.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: codingNot measured1424Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: software and ITNot measured1431Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
IntelligenceLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index10
Intelligence benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Intelligence Index26.512.7Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Neither model has a result on the other 1 board here
Agentic workDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Agentic work benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
AA Agentic IndexNot measured1.3Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LiveBench research70.9%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench browser4.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
LiveBench long agentic15.8%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Vending-Bench 2Not measured-$11Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 37 boards here
ReasoningDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index7 boards, none shared
Reasoning benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
LiveBench reasoning78.8%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Humanity's Last Exam (Artificial Analysis run)30.7%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
GPQA Diamond (Epoch AI run)Not measured80.1%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Mystery game puzzlesNot measured9.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard promptsNot measured1416Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: expertNot measured1463Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: hard prompts in EnglishNot measured1432Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 16 boards here
MathDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index3 boards, none shared
Math benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
OTIS Mock AIMENot measured86.7%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: mathNot measured1412Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: mathematical workNot measured1435Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 11 boards here
KnowledgeDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index5 boards, none shared
Knowledge benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
SimpleQA VerifiedNot measured40.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: scienceNot measured1433Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: medicine and healthcareNot measured1456Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: legal and governmentNot measured1415Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: business and financeNot measured1413Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 15 boards here
Web designLike-for-likePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index50
Web design benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Design Arena: websites11731052Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Design Arena: UI components1149942Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Design Arena: game dev1110956Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Design Arena: data vizNot measured950Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Design Arena: 3D1128997Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Design Arena: all code categories11541032Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
LiveBench design60.7%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Neither model has a result on the other 2 boards here
GeneralDirectional onlyPublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index22 boards, none shared
General benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
LiveBench data analysis64.6%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
Long context reasoning (AA-LCR)69.0%Not measuredOnly Nemotron 3.5 Super VL measured
DTBenchNot measured80.3%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMCANot measured29.3%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Fiction.LiveBenchNot measured75.0%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Creative writing (Lech Mazur)Not measured82.4%Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena TextNot measured1415Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: instruction followingNot measured1386Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: creative writingNot measured1384Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: EnglishNot measured1429Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: non-EnglishNot measured1397Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: ChineseNot measured1481Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: GermanNot measured1408Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: JapaneseNot measured1386Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: KoreanNot measured1375Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: SpanishNot measured1389Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: RussianNot measured1401Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: PolishNot measured1390Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: multi-turnNot measured1406Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: longer queriesNot measured1400Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: writing and languageNot measured1388Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
LMArena Text: entertainment and mediaNot measured1370Only Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 measured
Neither model has a result on the other 26 boards here
Image generationNot comparablePublic boards, shown as published, kept out of the index0 boards, none shared
Image generation benchmarks for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
BenchmarkNemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507Leader
Neither model has a result on 5 boards here

What each workload costs

Three fixed token mixes at each model's listed price, so per-token rates become a bill.

Chat turn

1K input + 500 output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0004Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.0022Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Repository review

50K input + 3K output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.0090Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.033Fits in one request

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Agent loop

200K input + 10K output tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL$0.035Fits in one request
Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507$0.125Exceeds the context window

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs less

Listed OpenRouter rates, without cache or batch discounts. A workload that does not fit a model's context window would need splitting.

Specification differences

The leading value in a row is marked; a row with a missing value names no leader. Our two rows are marked in red.

Specifications of Nemotron 3.5 Super VL and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
SpecificationNVIDIA Nemotron 3.5 Super VLQwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507
MakerNVIDIAQwen
WeightsOpen weightsOpen weights
ReleasedOctober 15, 2026July 25, 2025
Context window1.05M128K
Input $/Mtok$0.15$0.45
Output $/Mtok$0.50$3.50
Coding indexNot benchmarkedNot benchmarked
Independent measurements behind it10
Cost per solved taskNot computableNot computable
SourceOpenRouter listingOpenRouter listing

Questions

Is Nemotron 3.5 Super VL better than Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 for coding?

Neither model has a coding score yet, so the two cannot be ranked on coding. Pick Nemotron 3.5 Super VL for output tokens 7.0x cheaper ($0.50 vs $3.50 per million) and a larger context window (1.05M against 128K tokens).

Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL costs $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.50 per million output tokens; Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 costs $0.45 and $3.50. Cost per solved task is known for neither of them.

Which has the bigger context window, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL or Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks is the Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507 comparison based on?

6 benchmarks have a result for both models as of October 22, 2026. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL's coding index rests on 1 independent benchmark and Qwen3 235B A22B Thinking 2507's on 0. Where only one model has a result, the page says so instead of naming a winner.

Compare next